harpsman wrote: » Redmond and Barr gettin sent off- Barr for a Cantona style lunge iirc,
Stoner wrote: » That's a fair point. I think the argument is bigger than Donegal and Dublin. Mayos attitude to the league has been questioned too. It is IMO a competition to target, the alternative is to have a silver bullet to fire once later on in the year. I remember winning the league in the early 1990s under Paddy Cullen it was a great feeling. I remember Donegal and Dublin playing in a high stake league final back around the too possibly 93. They were good days, I'd rather they were back and to be honest anyone who was at the games in early 1990s and yesterday from both our counties would likely agree.
babybuilder wrote: » All-Ireland final 2014
Nidgeweasel wrote: » Pappa will not play in the Championship if he is based in Qatar. By the sounds of it he's weighing up if he can come back. He has nothing left to prove and owes us nothing. My god what a boost it would be though.
babybuilder wrote: » Even more reason to be getting your act together pretty soon.
PressRun wrote: » Ulster is a slog. The other provincials aren't. That's the bottom line really.
Stoner wrote: » Let's be honest , Kilkenny have to show up against Dublin and Galway in the hurling. Ulster is strong, etc but the likes of Cavan and Monaghan, Fermanagh, Down, Derry have yet to demonstrate that they can produce outside of beating Donegal or Tyrone to any significant degree. Monaghan melt against Kerry and Dublin imo. With the greatest respect to those teams and I sure they are capable of making up ground, but Mayo, Kerry, Dublin and the cork team of three years ago were really only worried about meeting Donegal or Tyrone. It's tough to get out of yes full of all Ireland winning teams , imo no.
Nidgeweasel wrote: » Even with going through the motions the defeats have been worrying, riddled with indiscipline (Kerry), sluggish (Roscommon), pathetic tactics (Dublin) and being out fought (Monaghan). Noticeably ran out of fumes in all four of those games too. 2) we've seen absolutely nothing by way of tactics displayed and the line slow to react as usual and 3)
Nidgeweasel wrote: Dublin do. Kilkenny do.
overshoot wrote: » I think its more to do with fitness levels rather than general tactics. I hope its a case of Rory protecting some of the older lads from burnout later in the year and that is why we have fallen behind particularly second half. Time will tell... but I do have grave reservations
bob skunkhouse wrote: » Our first game of the championship isn't until the glorious 12th! That's 2 months away and against an average Fermanagh team or weaker Antrim team. Even if we did win yesterday and made it to the final, that gives us 7 weeks till our first championship game. There's more than ample time there to do what you need on the training pitch and give the league a decent rattle.
Nidgeweasel wrote: » They also have a front loaded Championship where they need to be on it from the first round.
Bonniedog wrote: » Good teams go out to win every thing. Ask Cody. Anyone think he goes into the dressing room before a league semi final and tells the boys to go out and have a bit of crack and not to mind whether they win or lose? He does in his bollix. I remember when Dublin wouldn't have gotten a kick in a stampede and there were people close to then then management saying they didn't care about the league, and sure it was only March, and sure they'd be flying in August. Then having their arses handed to them on a plate by whoever got first digs on them. I prefer the JG way myself.
Nidgeweasel wrote: What people are rightly saying is it's blatantly obvious the current (and previous as it happens) regime doesn't give two hoots about the league.
harpsman wrote: » It seems a few visitors to the thread struggling to understand very basic English and taking it a bit personally that some teams happy to go throught the motions in some league games. Not to worry
PressRun wrote: » I didn't say they lost it on purpose, but they didn't seem to have any discernable plan to ensure that they would have a real chance at winning. The approach seemed to be "We'll go out and do our best and see what happens". Donegal supposedly didn't train together once this week (someone more in the know might be able to confirm that). Both Jim Gavin and Rory Gallagher said in post-match interviews that Donegal more than likely have an eye on the championship. If we were in July or August, I imagine the tactics might be a bit different. Given the history of teams not being all that interested in the league, it can hardly be that surprising to you that a team might not be putting in the same amount of time and effort that they might do later in the year. And you're correct about the correlation between Dublin's league success and championship succes, but as I said, for the third time, whether certain teams taking a not-so-serious approach to the league is correct or not is a whole other debate. Now, do I think Donegal are the same team they were under McGuinness? Perhaps not. I think they looked a lot more measured under him. But do I think they'll still have something to say in the championship? Absolutely, because at the end of the day, I think that's probably all they care about.
squareball1988 wrote: » Met a few honest Dubs in a pub afterwards. They put a point to me that we've a great team. Man for man we're Top 4 by any metric. They had obvious problems with our style, but as I reminded them it has been very effective to date, but said we've a team capable of going out and giving every match a decent go by playing "proper" football. Says I that we can't cos we've Ulster to win. And "proper" football isn't something that will win Ulster for you. I also argued their use of "proper". But even if we decided change our style is Rory the man to do it for us? It doesn't matter who else would or wouldn't replace him but I've given it enough thought to believe that he isn't the man for us. Too many McHughs on the panel too. and I'm not talking about players. Stephen McBrearty gave a decent performance too. He'll have a good Ulster.
Ceist_Beag wrote: » In fairness to RG he's in good company there. Let's not for one second suggest that RG is the main reason Donegal lost yesterday - this is an exceptional Dublin team that will take some stopping again this year.
Bonniedog wrote: » I think RG is genuinely flummoxed as how to beat Dublin.
corny wrote: » Just checked...the year Donegal won the AI they also finished on 6 points, didn't make the semis, were beaten by Laois:eek: and were walloped by Kerry. Say what you will about their current state but its undeniable they've a history of half arseing the league.
Stoner wrote: » Would have been closer if Murphy had his shooting boots with him.