Carnacalla wrote: » 747 inbound SNN. 19,000ft and decending. Stobart about to turn for approach, wind 240 degrees 40kts G 49kts.
Carnacalla wrote: » EI3701 (STK01BH) BHX-ORK diverting to SNN.
Chris_5339762 wrote: » Thats unfortunate as FAU got in around the same time.
Skuxx wrote: » Anyone notice the balloons or "Google Loon" showing over South America? Are they a new thing?
highlydebased wrote: » STK3805 to SNN too.
pepe the prawn wrote: » Anyone know why the Stobarts arent trying RWY07?
Chris_5339762 wrote: » Could be to do with the pilot/co-pilot arrangement. Correct me if I'm wrong but 07 has to be a pilot approach (not co-pilot) and not all the pilots are trained in it.
Growler!!! wrote: » Wind was out of limits and cloudbase too low.
pepe the prawn wrote: » Thanks, is that because of a VOR approach as opposed to an ILS?
Growler!!! wrote: » No idea where you heard that. But it's wrong.
Chris_5339762 wrote: » I actually heard that on here, this very thread. Or one of its previous incarnations.
Growler!!! wrote: » As the runway is nether short
Carnacalla wrote: » That's debatable.
Chris_5339762 wrote: » Shannon never seems to have a problem with diverts, seems to me its runway is at an optimum angle. Why is Corks runway at such a seemingly stupid angle? It is just the geography of its (stupid) position?