lawred2 wrote: » It's a bit small town minded to expect everyone on the road to know exactly what they are doing every minute of their journey.
Lantus wrote: » Quicker we develop cars that drive themselves quicker we eliminate this problem and the 1million wasted lives killed each year globally by forcing humans to drive high speed 1 ton death bricks around complex road systems.
biko wrote: » Yeah I know what you mean, it can get stressful. Try using a phone app like Waze or just Google navigation. It'll make the journey much easier when you get aural instructions where to go.
Charles Babbage wrote: » Being in a rental car does not entitle you to act the bollix. Like ironclaw I've made manys the loop in the USA, but I did not drive dangerously.
lawred2 wrote: » Doesn't excuse any other 'knowledgeable' drivers deliberately acting the bollix either.. Like another poster said, two wrongs don't make a right.
cletus wrote: » But if you are in your correct lane, you are under no obligation to allow somebody to cut in. This same thing happens all the time on my way to work. On a particular roundabout, the left lane is much busier that the right, but people just fly down the right lane, onto the roundabout, then cut into the left lane. Like ironclaw, I won't allow drivers like that to merge. If I've gone to the trouble of driving correctly, why should I allow some other idiot to force me to stop on a roundabout just because they think their time is more important than mine
Cee-Jay-Cee wrote: » There are 3 things that drivers do that contribute to traffic jams and hold ups. 1. Drive into yellow boxes when it's clear their exit isn't free and then Get stuck in the of when the lights change and sit there staring dead ahead for fear of catching other irate drivers eyes as they know they're in the wrong. 2. Fail to watch lights changing to green and then fumbling around looking to get the car in gear and handbrake off wasting time. 3. Driving onto roundabouts when their lane is clearly stopped and blocking others using other lanes. This IMO should be a whipping offence.
lawred2 wrote: » That doesn't make any sense unless that roundabout is designed to specifically facilitate that. Is it a two lane into one exit? If not; then someone is acting the pr!ck - which there are plenty of on the road.. For me; I'd prefer not be a pr!ck back. If someone is prepared to act so boorish so as to get somewhere 5 seconds quicker than me - then best of luck to them. I'm not interested in pointless dick waving exercises..
josip wrote: » I think the scenario described by cletus has time savings/costs in excess of 5 seconds. I'm not sure what kind of scenario you have in mind.
lawred2 wrote: » I never understand engaging the handbrake at any time other than when parked or when stationary on a steep hill.. traffic lights? pretty much never
beauf wrote: » The reason to do it. Is if shunted from behind you aren't launched into the car in front or into on coming traffic.
lawred2 wrote: » You wouldn't use the foot brake no? Much better stopping power then engaging the handbrake for the situation you describe
grogi wrote: » But handbrake will not disengage when hit from behind. Your foot will...
dudara wrote: » I got in a small argument with my father recently about driving in Cork (I'm from Cork, but have lived in Dublin for years). He maintains that Cork people drive with more consideration than Dublin. I basically said "b***cks". Generalising hugely (so apologies fellow Corkonians), but I've never seen a worse group of drivers for hogging and blocking junctions than Cork drivers. It's a completely different driving culture to Dublin
fin12 wrote: » if you are way back in the line theres nothing wrong with putting the handbrake on, I couldn't keep my leg on the cluthch and break the whole time, it doesnt take that long to release the handbrake. Actually in driving lessons if you are the first 3 cars in the line you should keep your leg on the clutch and break ready to move but any car after that putting up the handbrake and putting in neutral is fine.
Balmed Out wrote: » Seems a lot of people seem to think its perfectly acceptable to go into the wrong lane skip all the traffic and then merge in at the top. I'm even seeing it at the Bandon roundabout recently merging at speed with an amber light and blasting the horn at anyone in the way.
lawred2 wrote: » Wonder are the first few cars at a red light more or less likely to be rear ended? Statistically speaking
fin12 wrote: » Is Dublin difficult to navigate what lanes you should be in in the city? I have never driven there and might drive there in the summer but I'm not sure if I should and just stick with the bus.
lawred2 wrote: » Like everywhere - if you're not familiar with it, especially the circular traffic flows, then yes of course it can be difficult. A good satnav would help. But as can be evidenced on this thread - you can forget about getting any help from some of the other more 'knowledgeable' drivers.
fin12 wrote: » I dont particurly want to drive there its just driving there that time might be more easier because i will be staying outside the city in Dublin city university campus.