Paully D wrote: » Not sure how I missed that! Either way, even if he wins that he's behind Bisping in line for sure.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » Lay and pray and frankie edgar? no. Someone asked how to beat him. He answered. Would you call gsp a lay and pray fighter? How would you rate gsp mindset?
Paully D wrote: » Bisping certainly deserves one with the way the middleweight landscape is, IMO. Rockhold and Weidman are obviously scheduled. Souza lost to Romero who subsequently popped and both fighters gassed after a round. Belfort is scheduled to fight Souza next month and is a horrid cheat anyway who deserves nothing. Machida has lost 2 in a row and seems no closer to making a comeback. Kennedy has been inactive for ages. Silva, Brunson, Whittaker and Mousasi are all matched up over the next couple of months so who knows how things will look there. In addition, in fairness to Bisping he has always done things straight by the book and has been a company man throughout his time in the UFC, while the vast majority of his losses have come to proven cheaters. I don't see a more logical middleweight contender at the moment.
Devastator wrote: » Weidman out of 199 :eek::eek: Slater from Saved by the Bell gets a title shot!!!! :eek::eek::pac:https://twitter.com/MarioLopezExtra/status/717788942376914944
Lukker- wrote: » GSP was definitely a lay n pray fighter in his later career.
ironictoaster wrote: » You nearly gave me a heart attack. You're legend by the way. Thank you very much!
Easy Rod wrote: » Ha, nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. Slightly more cautious yes but not a lay and prayer by any definition.
Devastator wrote: » yeah yeah I know :pac::pac: Did you get sorted?
ironictoaster wrote: » I did. I had to order through all the app. The site on my laptop kept crashing. 4 rows from the cage!
lougal88 wrote: » Didn't see it posted anywhere else. Rampage will fight against Satoshi Ishii at Bellator "Dynamite 2" on June 24th. Good to see him back!
Spudman_20000 wrote: » According to Helwani on Twitter, Khabib cannot fight in July because of Ramadan. Do ye reckon RDA would have know this already before he threw himself into the mix?
lougal88 wrote: » Bisping might not be a great example but IMO he's been overlooked in the past regarding a title shot. Also hes the only top 10 active MW on a 3 fight win streak who doesn't have a fight lined up.
Lukker- wrote: » Far more then slightly IMO. After Serra he seemed to be content to advance his position as slow as possible when he was on the ground, always looking at the referee. He'd attempt subs that he knew he had no chance getting just to score points too. I understand his cautious approach and wanting to cement his position at the top but his last fights were dreadful to watch.
Mellor wrote: » When was Bisping overlooked? be specific.
Davei141 wrote: » Tate vs Nunes announced for UFC 200. Very underwhelming card.http://mmajunkie.com/2016/04/amanda-nunes-challenges-miesha-tate-for-womens-bantamweight-title-at-ufc-200
maximoose wrote: » Was flicking after the Champions League lastnight and caught UFC Breakdown on BT Sport for the first time. Must say - after you get past the slightly tacky production of the show it's actually really good :eek: Has got me excited for Rothwell v JDS
Swashbuckler wrote: » I wouldn't call Frankie a lay and pray type fighter. No way.
hefferboi wrote: » I was talking about Alvarez.
ASOT wrote: » Khabib and Cowboy goting at it in twitter, be a decent replacement. Ferguson wants to the fight to be put back to May.
Devastator wrote: » Seems only fair. Ferguson was due to fight at 196 but when Khabib said he would only be available April TF said he would wait to fight him even though his wife(partner) was heavily pregnant. If TF's able to fight within a matter of weeks then Khabib should agree to a short postponement