spacetweek wrote: » Rename the thread! Where did you get €107M from?
Section E: Irish Government Financial Support: :: The Dublin government has pledged “targeted investment” in cross-border economic infrastructure. :: It has committed a further £25m to the £50m it is already spending on the A5 dual carriageway linking Derry to Aughnacloy. However, the Irish government had previously committed £400m to the project – an undertaking it pulled in 2011.
sonnyblack wrote: » It drives me daft to see the Irish government agreeing to provide funding to a road scheme that is outside our jurisdiction when in the meantime the death-trap M20 Cork to Limerick roads remains in cold storage. Funding this scheme should be the lowest of the low priority The mind boggles
Deedsie wrote: » Well so far the Irish government have welched on a commitment of £400m down to £75m. It also would be infrastructure directly beneficial to the the most isolated part of our jurisdiction. It would also benefit the many thousands of Irish citizens living in Northern Ireland. M20 is more worthy but if it helps keep the devolved administration on track, I consider it a good investment.
marmurr1916 wrote: » Much of the missing £325 million will be made up by the Northern Ireland Executive (for which read British taxpayers since NI is heavily subsidised by Britain) - entirely appropriate since NI remains under British rule, is among the most isolated parts of the UK's jurisdiction and since the road will benefit the many thousands of British citizens living in Northern Ireland. :P
marno21 wrote: » Am I the only one who finds it strange that the Irish government are committing money to dual the A5 yet the road which the A5 connects to in the Irish republic remains single carriageway?
Redsoxfan wrote: » As I now favour the M3 route to Letterkenny I have not been on the A5 in a long time.
Deedsie wrote: » How much did the British government loan us directly during the bailout shenanigans?
Deedsie wrote: » Since the foundation of the state, successive Irish governments have provided nothing for the ~ 500000 Irish citizens living in Northern Ireland. I support the government in this funding 100%
L1011 wrote: » £3.2Bn at the second highest interest rate of any of the lenders (more than twice what some are charging). They aren't making a loss on this.
Deedsie wrote: » Were the forced to help us out? They are in enormous debt themselves already. Why wouldn't they try to recoup some interest.
Deedsie wrote: » I dunno if you are kidding or what but I still maintain it is a good use of government funds. How much did the British government loan us directly during the bailout shenanigans? Ireland and Britain are co guarantors on the Good Friday Agreement. The A5 road will benefit both Irish and Northern Irish people. I agree 100% that the M20 is far more deserving of funding but that doesn't make this project any less worthy. Since the foundation of the state, successive Irish governments have provided nothing for the ~ 500000 Irish citizens living in Northern Ireland. I support the government in this funding 100%
Senna wrote: » N3 or M2? Just interested as I still take the m1, n2 and a5 route.
Richard wrote: » Very few of these citizens pay Irish taxes.
Charles Babbage wrote: » In any case, more to the point of this forum this project is now moving towards progresshttp://www.a5wtc.com/Flythroughs--Proposed-Scheme-2016
Schadenfreudia wrote: » Looking at the "flyover" animation it appears the road will have a wide median but no hard shoulders? Rather odd prioritisation??
spacetweek wrote: » Yes, I noticed that. The thinking nowadays in some countries is that you don't need hard shoulders since cars are reliable but for safety and sight lines reasons you still need a wide median. In the Rep we do the opposite.
hi5 wrote: » I would have thought it would be on hold until after the Brexit Referendum. Going through customs borders to use a road you have paid for seems a bit daft.
Deleted User wrote: » I suspect that the chance of border controls being put in place are extremely unlikely, there are several outcomes that could result from the referendum.
marno21 wrote: » A legal challenge has been lodged against the proposed A5 scheme, which may push the start date back to 2018.http://www.tyronecon.co.uk/articles/news/54474/new-legal-challenge-mounted-against-a5-project/