Pierce_1991 wrote: , it surely can't be the case that they were so afraid of Dublin that they just decided to go for the blanket.
Stoner wrote: » I think they were afraid of getting another hammering. I can't see what they'd have up their sleeve apart from conditioning and peaking later on, their games this year early on were good, we've seen that, they weren't hiding anything.The roscommon result wasn't great for them and they needed to contain a side like dublin to show progress.
Pierce_1991 wrote: » I'm just thinking they don't want to give the Dubs any edge. When they hammered us a couple of years ago they produced a performance that we hadn't really seen from them before, maybe they are banking on doing something similar and don't want to give Dublin a free practice go in March.
ProudDUB wrote: » I tend to agree with this. After 2014, my paranoia about Donegal laying in the long grass knows no bounds. However, I don't think that Rory Gallagher is as good a tactician & strategist as Jim McGuinness was. So I don't think he will be able to set Donegal up to take advantage of our short comings, as brilliantly as McGuinness did.McG also had Donegal playing with a controlled aggression, that kept them on the right side of the law for the most part. Gallagher seems to want a more naked aggression approach & I think it could really cost them down the line.
Boom__Boom wrote: » I'd love to see a comparison of the number of frees/yellows/reds/black conceded by Donegal under Gallagher versus McGuinness - playing a blanket defence and conceding 1-2 scoreable frees in the course of a game is one thing, but conceding 5-6 scoreable frees is an entirely different kettle of fish.
Pierce_1991 wrote: » I can't help but feel that Donegal may have been trying to keep their cards close to their chest last night.
corny wrote: » Bit of a campaign going on against James McCarthy in the media. Anyone think he gouged McElhinney? I thought he pushed him in the face. Definitely deserved his red but calling it gouging is a bit far imo. Might be spillover from McMahons actions last year.
Paulzx wrote: » I'm reading nothing into that game. Donegal were dead on their feet the last 20mins and it was quite obvious they are nowhere near the fitness levels required to play their usual game. That won't apply in another couple of months
Stoner wrote: » Actually DoctaDee we left Scully out of that last mix, he's been tried in the half back line and looked good, even though we might identify him with a forward role.
DoctaDee wrote: » Yes and no - I saw them last year in the league semi against Cork and it was quite evident their heads were already on the Ulster Champ game in May. This year they aren't out til middle of June so the distractions are minimal. You're quite right - they'll do what they do quicker and stronger with a greater degree of intensity - but I don't see them doing anything new. In actual fact the nature of the Ulster Champ will virtually dictate they'll play football to the same template as previous years. A semi v Monaghan and a probable final v Tyrone will more than likely be trench warfare
ProudDUB wrote: » Why do you think you can't buy in advance? You can buy them on tickets.ie or at participating Centra and Supervalu shops. Or just pay on the day at the gate, or from the ticket van in the car park. I'd be very surprised if it's a sell out.
salmocab wrote: What would happen if and Im not suggesting it will or should happen, but if Dublin said that pitch isn't playable? Would there be a fine or points deducted.
ProudDUB wrote: » Oh sorry, I thought you meant getting your hands on an adult ticket in advance. Still don't think you'll have a problem. The Galway game was no where near a sell out. There were plenty of empty seats in the stands, never mind the terraces. They would be a much bigger draw than Limerick, even though this is a quarter final. Get there half an hour before throw in, if you're still worried.