Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Christ boys and girls ye are very sensitive. Will ye get over yourselves. You are a laughing stock fair enough, a big shiny bus but a dump of a ground, blowing hot air last year and getting dumped out by lesser teams not once but twice. But all we are doing is laughing at ye, noting more.
mayo.mick wrote: » 3/4's of the pitch was like that;
nice_guy80 wrote: » It's not very neighbourly to be so critical of Roscommon's lack of a decent pitch and our difficulties with this. I always thought the GAA was a community organisation. The pitch in kiltoom was more than adequate for games in Division 2, 3 and 4. If ye are down there in the future your perspective on that might change.
megadodge wrote: » Yeah, because if we didn't lease out a bus, we'd have enough money for a new ground!! Brilliant analysis!
homewardbound11 wrote: » This is turning in to a Roscommon thread . Can we focus on next week and then the championship . For one I'm delighted for Roscommon and the fact now we have 3 teams in the top 10. Making Connaught titles very competitive . As for the league we wanted survival and hopefully that will come next weekend . Unfortunately we haven't added significantly to the panel apart from Durcan and hopefully Regan will bed in some more . Overall we are where we thought we would be given the injuries and club commitments . I only hope that there is a stronger emphasis on goals as we were one of the poorest goal scoring teams whilst we focuses far too much on defensive work . We have great running half backs and there was little of that seen this league .
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Ye would have a bit more money to get the gardening right.
The situation is made a little clearer by the Connacht Council's decision on Tuesday to move Saturday's provincial Under-21 final from Hyde Park to Markievicz Park in Sligo, where they action will get underway at 6.0.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » U21 Final moved to Sligohttp://www.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2016/0329/778061-hyde-park/
padd b1975 wrote: » Moving it out of the county appears to be a slap on the wrists for the state of the pitch on Sunday.
seligehgit wrote: » TBF I think Stephen Rochford has placed an emphasis on making us a defensively a more secure unit.We have a past history of leaking crucial goals.I think he has achieved quite an amount success in this regard.
PressRun wrote: » I think the focus on improving the defensive strategy has allowed Ger Cafferky to come back into his own more recently. I often heard him getting a bit of a hard time from Mayo supporters during the Horan era, but, to be fair, I don't think Horan's preferred style of play always suited him. While it was exciting to watch Leeroy and Colm Boyle charging up the pitch, it often left players like Cafferky without any support and then he (and others) would get the blame when the **** hit the fan, defensively.
Green Tae wrote: » Yes, this was noticeable yesterday. However a lot of the great work that the backs did was squandered when the ball was transferred to midfield. Aiden O'Shea consistently takes too much out of the ball. Is he perhaps a liability at midfield? Of the Breaffy contingent Seamus O'Shea is perhaps the most effective footballer in that squad.When you watch how Kerry dismantled Monaghan or Dublin's second half performances you can see a clear gap in performance levels. That's probably the next level that Rochford needs to get this team to.
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » I'm hearing Cunniffe has left the panel
Syferus wrote: » It was our own choice. It had informally been decided even before throw in on Sunday. Too much money at stake for the Dublin game to not give it every chance of being played at home. Lol at the idea idea, though. Kiltoom too small to host it. It was Tuam or Sligo.
Slogger24 wrote: » If it rains at all this week .Ye wont be playing in the Hyde this weekend!! It'll take it another month to repair after sunday
km79 wrote: » heavy rain / flooding promised Friday/ Saturday no chance it will go ahead there