timthumbni wrote: » Religion though I'm not that hopeful. In the modern world where all information is at the end of your fingertips on the old tinternet I really don't get why people are still religious.
diomed wrote: » Getting sentencing ar5ewars. Multiple offenders let out to re-offend. Steal big and it isn't a problem. Put €100 in the poor box and you can box the head off anyone.
Brussels Sprout wrote: » I think it could be our attitude to mental health problems. The fact that there's a hidden epidemic of people on anti-depressants but it was never brought up as an issue in the recent general election. This also ties into the homelessness issue as a lot of the long-term homeless people are people with mental illnesses who have fallen through the cracks. I think the issue is slowly improving though and for that reason in 100 years time it could be a lot better situation.
timthumbni wrote: » Facebook. If we aren't ashamed of that absolute ridiculous mindfeck then we are lost. Status. On the bog... Taking a whizz, having lunch, out for a walk etc etc.
foxy farmer wrote: » The mass hysteria and blind belief that a lump of plaster could be dancing a jig up on the side of a cliff in Ballinspittle in Cork in the 80s.
HardenendMan wrote: » War in general. I think our great grandchildren will see our recent wars as pointless and as barbaric as we see the nazis. I think I'm 100 years the world will be as United / peaceful as the western countries are today. The idea that army's can go invade another country just won't be an option.
HardenendMan wrote: » Was going to say social media but the more I thought about it the more I believe that it will be even more prevalent in 100 years. People will live more and more within the digital world.
SnakePlissken wrote: » Not banning Muslims entry into Europe when we had the chance
Candie wrote: » We live in a world where over 36 million people live with and suffer from HIV/Aids. Less than 16 million of those people have access to the treatment that will give them a normal life, and virtually stop further infections.It's an ongoing holocaust, one the world cares far too little about because those millions and millions who don't get treatment are mostly poor and powerless. It's hard to think of any current inhumanity greater than that.
tomwaterford wrote: » Without sounding complety conspiracy theorist Allowing the accumulation of wealth at the top/richest level I read before something like 20 people in America have as much money as the bottom 100 million While them occupy movements may be extreme etc....them holding so much money and the poorest going without is in no way right and at root of many problems As for how to fix this....I'm fcuked if I know....but I do think it will be looked back in 100 years as wrong to not at least a serious attempt to narrow the gap between the haves and have nots
Wanderer78 wrote: » you might enjoy the work of economists such as ellen brown, ha-joon chang, bill black and michael hudson on such matters. they have some good ideas on how we may rectify such issues