Kankan14 wrote: » I was embarrassingly unaware there was a movie of entourage made. Came across it on sky movies today and sky plussed it. Hope its good!
PTH2009 wrote: » The constant use of the f word, the whispering thing etc can be annoying
gerrybbadd wrote: » I never thought Tommy was funny either. Too shouty
sky88 wrote: » never got the appeal of tiernan. always found him unfunny
PTH2009 wrote: » Saw Tommy tiernan last night and have to say the show was a pale comparison of what he was in the past. Some funny bits but id give the show about 5.5 out of 10. The annoying Fred Cooke supported him and he is as annoying and plastic as he is portrayed in republic of tele, the fear etc. U could of thought of the same jokes urself.
PTH2009 wrote: » Batman vs superman really does not deserve the bad reviews it's been getting. May of been slow at the start but it gets moving fairly fast after that. Jessie eisenberg was great playing lex (he seemed a bit like the joker to me), Affleck was fairly OK playing batman.
Nerdkiller1991 wrote: » Well...I've got words to say about Batman v Superman...unfortunately, they are not kind words. Pure '90's comic wankery. Superman is broken. Batman just as much so. Wonder Woman...not so much, actually. Eisenberg as Lex is about as terrible as you'd expect him to be, as they seemed to have smashed his portrayal of Mark Zuckerberg with The Joker. He also hates the heroes, because...reasons. Never clearly explained why. And then there's Doomsday, which is actually pretty accurate, considering how much of a one note character he was in his initial appearance, so either way, not good. I mean, people seem to give Batman and Robin a lot of derision, but after the release of this movie (and the subsequent treatment of Batman in modern era as this dark, brooding, gritty, crack no jokes guy and people seemed to have latched onto because of those reasons), I'd be happy to see a movie like that after viewing this. Make no mistake, this is quite possibly the absolute worst DC related thing to ever have been put on the big screen.
Bounty Hunter wrote: » In no way will I say that he should have gotten less time but 6 years in prison for a crime like his can be like an eternity i'd imagine. I would not be surprised to see him being targeted in prison plus if there is anyone who would be less equipped for Prison life it'd be someone who has lead the pampered life of a professional footballer since he was a youth. I too would expect him to be out in 3/4 years though
Lithium93_ wrote: » He should've had the whole ****ing library thrown at him, 6 years is a joke of a sentence, he'll be out in 3 or 4 for "good behaviour" mark my words... 6 years, his sentence should've been longer..
beakerjoe wrote: » Adam Johnson gets 6 years. Well deserved in my book. He knew what he was doing, he knew it was wrong yet still did it.
Furious-Red wrote: » Yea id say security will be increased over the 1916 events since it would be a perfect target .
