SarahJ wrote: » Great thread. Personally, I don't want to see people's children, messing with their makeup or using all the snapchat filters, bugs me so much! There's one particular blogger who will say I want to respect my partners privacy and my sons privacy, but then the next 20 snaps are her son, I don't understand that. I also couldn't give a crap about what you are having for breakfast, that you are having a coffee and cake so you want to share a pic of it. It's not interesting content to people. I think the whole blogging thing is getting out of hand to be honest. There's another blogger who announced they are pregnant recently and it's literally all she talks about. She has said she was going to do pregnancy posts and YouTube videos, so I had to unfollow. Don't get me wrong, great for her, I'm pregnant myself so nothing against that! It's just not the content I want to see
karensgal wrote: » As ameliams said this is probably about targeting brands, they're now open to collaborating with different brands due to the pregnancy. In saying that some people might be interested, some girls might also be on their 1st pregnancy and don't have other friends/family in similar situations so they're interested in following someone else's.
karensgal wrote: » I followed someone as they're noted as a makeup artist then find they just snap constantly about what they're making their boyfriend for dinner, going to their Mum's house for a cup of tea, buying meat from a butchers and other trivial nonsense. I'd no interest in this and there seemed to be more on this type of content than anything else so I simply unfollowed them.
ameliams wrote: » Really irritates me when pictures are just accompanied by emojis as well. Contrary to popular belief a picture is not always worth a thousand words.
Brandojan1 wrote: » I love all the new Irish make up artists on snapchat who do little tutorials and tips ect I'm over people's cats dogs visits for cups of teas I also cannot understand all the boyfriends trying to become snapchat famous its embarrassing like someone said earlier trying to keep their child and partners privacy and a million snaps of the child and the partner can't wait to get his face into a snap I love the beautiful truth her honesty is amazing her husband has no interest in being a snapchat "celebrity" She responds to all questions asked on Twitter Instagram and snapchat She's pregnant now and stated she has no desire to change her blog she's a beauty blogger and that's how it will remain
Noahboah2014 wrote: » Sorry I have to return to this above comment made by rosemary, I went onto your Instagram page as I was very curious about this raincoat, and noticed it was priced at 129. In my line of work this is the equivalent of 13 hours work. For you to claim that posting 2 Instagram posts, 5 tweets, a mention on a blog & two snap chat mentions was actually worth 10 of these 129 coats makes me wonder what sort of person you really are? I'm so shocked by this statement. Yes I no posting snaps etc take time, but let's be honest here, by no means did it possibly take more then a hour tops? And for you to think that hour of "work" is valued at the price of 10 of these coats is just totally insane.
Noahboah2014 wrote: » I've no issue with different jobs paying different rates. But find it quite arrogant to claim posting a few pictures on social media is worth 1290 euro. And that she was doing the business the favour by only taking the raincoat worth 129euro in exchange. Please. Come back to the real world.
meeeeh wrote: » In my line of work 129 would equal maximum 3 hours and I would dearly like to increase the rate. What employee gets is totally different to the cost for company or of contractor work. Frankly I can't imagine anyone but apprentice being paid 10 Euro or less in any job that requires some skills.
SB_Part2 wrote: » Noahboah2014 wrote: » I've no issue with different jobs paying different rates. But find it quite arrogant to claim posting a few pictures on social media is worth 1290 euro. And that she was doing the business the favour by only taking the raincoat worth 129euro in exchange. Please. Come back to the real world. If the business didn't think it was valuable to them they wouldn't have agreed to it.
Noahboah2014 wrote: » Add your reply here. Your missing my point really, the company agreed to this, yes. At the cost of a raincoat which was 129euro. It's Rosemary's comment of her postings being worth 10 of these said 129euro raincoats that bothered me.
Noahboah2014 wrote: » Add your reply here. I am actually a 3rd year nursing student, have not qualified yet, but work as a care giver. Which also needs a recognised certificate. Saying those in lower paid jobs don't involve "skills" is slightly rude really.
Noahboah2014 wrote: » I am actually a 3rd year nursing student, have not qualified yet, but work as a care giver. Which also needs a recognised certificate. Saying those in lower paid jobs don't involve "skills" is slightly rude really.
Noahboah2014 wrote: » I no there is a massive market for blogging/bloggers now, I understand that. But Rosemary & the company both clearly agreed that her postings were worth the price of the raincoat. Why then come on this thread and then say her postings were actually worth 10 times the agreement. I just can't understand that.