siblers wrote: » What site do ye use that predicts your rankings?
greedygoblin wrote: » 68 points and a projected red arrow. Captaining Siggy over Kane did most of the damage, as well as having Bellerin on the bench.
The Hunky Monster wrote: » Same as that with siggy over Kane. Imagine having 23 points on your bench like me.
PARlance wrote: » Checks in, checks out. Thanks Kun.
2nd Row Donkey wrote: » There was lots of merit in the decision to pick Aguero as captain. City are (for the most part) awesome at home. United have been shambolic at times and the LVG situation is just bizarre, it had the potential to be a bloodbath.
FHFC wrote: » These thoughts flashed across my mind at 11.43 exactly unfortunately. Plus Aguero had a hatful of chances vs Norwich and could have scored big so I felt he might get the rub of the green today. Was worried when I saw the United team with pretty much a first choice back 4. Deadline changes hurt when they go wrong.
SlickRic wrote: » The problem is, it cost big. I remember a similar week last season. Aguero was at home, as was Kane. I captained Kun, while what felt like everyone else captained Kane, causing a huge swing. Aguero was perfectly reasonable as a choice this week, and even with a shít team behind him, should've scored 2. Yet, huge swing because of Kane's spree. I had Bellerin on the bench. Perfectly reasonable. Huge swing because of a shítty assist. Bad 50/50 calls have ruined most of my season.
stephenl15 wrote: » You only have to go back to last week for a Kane vs Kun 50/50. Cost me 11 or so points Some will argue it was an easy decision to go with Kane due to Kuns away form but with Kun vs Norwich I thought it was 50/50 and edged me to Kun.
wonski wrote: » It was 50/50, but Aston Villa was more tasty imo.