fe1chancer wrote: » That fear will be mixed with an almighty hangover for the foreseeable future though:)
Galw2014 wrote: » I don't understand why independent don't give more sample answers, I can't even pick out the issues in the past papers! ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
lawbear wrote: » another good four or five hours to go yet, the possibilities are endless
fe1chancer wrote: » Tempted to test the red bull theory and hop out the window!!!!
fe1chancer wrote: » Throwing in the towel head is complete mush!! Best of luck tomorrow guys and thanks for all the support and tips, it made these horrible exams a little more bearable.
lawbear wrote: » I don't even know Pringle
kiwi33 wrote: » Pringle is the most repulsive case. very hard to read. what even is it on about. hard to learn something when you dont understand it.
lawbear wrote: » I'm not even going to try at his stage. Ive tried before, it just goes over my head. If art art 267 or 258 and my case notes don't come up I may get up and leave. Thank god theres a lot we can take from the legislation. I almost passed before just using that, I hadn't even studied I was just chancing my arm at it.
kiwi33 wrote: » Your the exact same as me those two articles and case notes are all ive done to any great extent and even at that its not done well. Hopefully if they come up and the legislation we might just make it! here's hoping.