OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » I had no idea. Originally I thought great a question of Competition and then I was like, wait is this a dominance question, nope. WHAT THE HELL WAS IT!!!!
CKonetheonlyone wrote: » My case notes cases didn't come up except for Test Achats. And the competition question - I wasn't expecting 106 and didn't know what to do with it. So I just transcribed 101/102/106, but I was too disheartened to even do that properly.
anosullivan wrote: » What was the question with the vacuums even about?
CKonetheonlyone wrote: » Interesting that there are no other post mortem posts here. I must be the only poor sod in the Red Cow who is not supping a pint or a glass of wine.
kiwi33 wrote: » Your the exact same as me those two articles and case notes are all ive done to any great extent and even at that its not done well. Hopefully if they come up and the legislation we might just make it! here's hoping.
lawbear wrote: » I'm not even going to try at his stage. Ive tried before, it just goes over my head. If art art 267 or 258 and my case notes don't come up I may get up and leave. Thank god theres a lot we can take from the legislation. I almost passed before just using that, I hadn't even studied I was just chancing my arm at it.
kiwi33 wrote: » Pringle is the most repulsive case. very hard to read. what even is it on about. hard to learn something when you dont understand it.
lawbear wrote: » I don't even know Pringle
fe1chancer wrote: » Throwing in the towel head is complete mush!! Best of luck tomorrow guys and thanks for all the support and tips, it made these horrible exams a little more bearable.