lawbear wrote: » In Broeckmeulen the court had to decide if an appeals committee for the dutch medical professional Body was a court or tribunal for the purposes of Art 267. Despite the fact that Dutch law did not recognise the appeals committee as a court or tribunal, the European court ruled that the appeals committee was a court or tribunal for the purposes of european union law. The reason for the courts decision was that the appeals committee operated with the consent and cooperation of the public authorities and that it delivered final decisions after an adversarial procedure from which there was no right of appeal to the ordinary courts. If there is no right of appeal then thats a good indicator.
lawbear wrote: » There is so much in competition ugh puke. Between the freedoms….goods, persons, capital, any of these favoured to come up? desperate here, need to cut big time.
Kcookies2015 wrote: » Nope no clue at all..... PQ on direct effect, PQ on economic freedoms / citizenship & case notes were tipped Items missing last sitting were competition, art267, role of charter of fundamental rights and essay on role of commission. Heading towards a fail here big time way too tired for this crap!
OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » The part I hate is that you spend so long learning so much and literally 50% you can throw out of your mind as soon as you open the paper. The other 50% lurks just out of reach in consciousness when you do actually need it!!!
anosullivan wrote: » Does anyone know which case notes came up last year? Just so i can cut some out? I have nine and ain't gonna have time to learn them all
CKonetheonlyone wrote: » was there an exam report for the last sitting of EU and if there was did it give any indication as to what the pass rate was? i have heard it's comparatively high
Kcookies2015 wrote: » 81% last sitting and 70% before but as far as I know this is a new examiner
Farrellk wrote: » Can anyone recommend what cases to focus on for the Case note question ? Can only remember 2 topics and becoming increasingly worried
EthanSS wrote: » Hi, just wondering does anybody have a very quick and concise summary of Microsoft v Commission. Everything I'm fining online about it is so fricking long. Thanks.
lawbear wrote: » Wilting big time. Covering competition, prelim ref, art 260, direct effect, case note hopefully, citizenship. Don't even REALLY know these. Ill try squeeze more of the freedoms into my head that I have notes done out on from few weeks ago (they look completely foreign now), Ill try read something on commission too. Long night ahead. I may drive to get some red bull and more cigarettes now soon.
kiwi33 wrote: » Does anyone have an EU law grid. The one I'm working of isnt the george best. It hasn't got the numbers of the questions of where the topic came up just an x in the box so im having to read through the questions to find it and its wasting my precious time at the minute
Kcookies2015 wrote: » Did I send it to you? If it was me sheet 2 on spread sheet is Q number and topic
kiwi33 wrote: » no i didn't get it from you. if you have it can i pm you my email please?
OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » Cant even remember what my kids faces look like....when they're talking to me I see caselaw and recite principles in my head...:(
kiwi33 wrote: » I know the feeling I had to leave my four year old at home and stay up here in dublin because between full time work and watching her in the evening I hadn't any time bar these two weeks to study. It's not easy! We're doing it for them. It'll all be worth it.
OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » I'm lucky I live up here and work in legal office so can bounce stuff off the other lawyers but....I do envy you two weeks childrenfree!!!
Kcookies2015 wrote: » Well I left my 10 year old who's full of attitude gladly haha! Here's to school runs, tae kwando, hurling, art and 2.5 weeks Easter holidays & no job wahoooo
fe1chancer wrote: » I'll settle for waking up without the crippling FE1 fear!!
Kcookies2015 wrote: » It'll just be replaced with results fear for 6 weeks... Don't be silly : )
