Figsy32 wrote: » Am I right in thinking the 2011 act postpones the 2009 act so that it's still the old law that's in place? But you need to know both? I could be reading it wrong though cause it's my last exam and I'm exhausted!
Kcookies2015 wrote: » It was in line with elwes v Briggs as found in the land then mention waverly borough v fletcher and Webb v Ireland . Then discuss finding by trespasser Parker v British airways & Hannah v peel. Owner of land only has superior claim if he has manifested an intention to control all articles found on his land. As in elwes v Briggs the current landowner has superior claim over trespasser. It's not an archaeological item and of historical interest so the state can't claim? Could be wrong
makemecrazy wrote: » For treasure trove and findings can anyone please advise me like last year, if John finds a bracelet in a mine who gets it? If its directly under the line of John and Pats land, in a mine would John or Pat get it or is it the states?
kiwi33 wrote: » If it was a braclet it won't be the states usually only treasure trove will be the states and a person can expect to get a reward. If u find it above land you have the best title to it unless the owner of the paper title can be found. If it's in the land it belongs to whoever owns the land If it half in half out out the arguments for both and say the court would have discretion but lean towards what you would think. It could be either. Although items attached to the land are usually considered part of the freehold but this doesn't apply if they are easily detached. I have a note of cases if you want it
Rebelgirl87 wrote: » And you said you were not a legal genius!!! Haha
Farrellk wrote: » Lads starting to get a bit worried about EU it's taking me way longer than it should per topic and im worried will be skimming it with topics going in ..... Would people suggest doing the case note and if so how many cases should you learn to be safe ? Very worried fe1er at the minute
Kcookies2015 wrote: » Microsoft Van Gend Association belge Ryan air holdings Chen That's all I'm learning anyways I haven't time
Farrellk wrote: » Grand might start there so ! How many topics are you planning to cover ? Nothing seems to be going in its all just a mish mash of Articles at this stage
lawgal wrote: » Easements is killing me! Does wheeldon v burrows need to be learnt in detail as it's now abolished? And all hat section on acquisition of easements?
Kcookies2015 wrote: » Well it's my 8th exam this sitting so unsure how many topics will go in currently studying for property with equity and contract waffle spilling out! Aiming to cover cases, directives, economic freedom/citizenship, competition, role of commission & fundamental rights.
lawbear wrote: » Fe1 Exams - when taking a shower feels like your taking a break from study…… and even at that theres a good chance you could fail
OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » When a shower feels like a luxury 😂 can't wait for Friday to be done so I can happily drink away all of my additional brain cells ...until next sitting!!
nope nope nope wrote: » oraghabd I have sample case notes for those, you might just have to wade through to find them, send me on your email and I'll send them on! If anyone has case notes for Ryanair, Pringle, Kadii II, Spain and Italy or Google, it would be a great help?
OfficeGirl2015 wrote: » Can I suggest the European Comission legal service website for summaries of important judgements...they are not all there but the ones that are cover all the relevant basis IMO
cup of tea wrote: » I didn't hand in my succession act today to be checked to obviously won't have it ready for me at 9.30.I understand you can hand it in on the day and get it back around 10?. Where do I hand it in and should I be there early to hand it in at like 8?
lawgal wrote: » Possibility of learning all succession in 4 1/2 hours?
fionnsci wrote: » Definitely doable. I never bought into the notion that there was nothing you could do the night before. You can learn huge amounts at the last minute. IT mightn't stay there forever but it should stay there until tomorrow.
CKonetheonlyone wrote: » Absolutely agree. My best work is done in the car park lol
