VisibleGorilla wrote: » Diaz outboxed McGregor with 10 day notice, no sparring, and food poisoning. McGregor is a one trick pony, when his left isn't there he has nothing.
JustTheOne wrote: » Yeah his kicks were ineffective against mendes alright. Or his ground work against Holloway. When is this thread gonna get back to normal?
TheAnalyst_ wrote: » That he's not a great MMA fighter.
Pudsy33 wrote: » He's a champion ffs :pac:
Martypants1 wrote: » He's been fighting midgets.
Gamebred wrote: » I'll post this again for you sweety. Conor McGregor is 5'9. There are 23 fighters standing at 5'10 or above in FW: 32% There are 13 fighters standing at 5'9: 18% There are 17 fighters standing at 5'8: 24% There are 14 fighters standing at 5'7: 19% There are 5 fighters standing at 5'6: 7% Average height: 5'9 1/2 of the FW roster is either the same height as Conor or taller. 1/3 of the FW roster is taller than Conor. 1/4 of the FW roster is only 1" shorter than him. They are the facts,half of the division is the same height or bigger.
gallag wrote: » Post the stats for the ones Connor "the midget slayer" actually fought though, also anyone else think Connor was saved by the bell in the first? He looked tired and nate looked to be reversing his guard into mount.
Gamebred wrote: » But its a division of midgets? Will I post the stats of Jon Jones wins? he should be at heavyweight hes beating midgets like cormier and sonnen vitor machida rasha,height advantage over all of them so his wins are meaningless fraud if he doesnt go heavyweight isnt he.
Chris. wrote: » There's no pint arguing with them, their arguments are one dimensional and only apply to Conor. Pointing out a fact like that will not even register with them.
TheAnalyst_ wrote: » ftw.usatoday.com/2016/03/ufc-196-conor-mcgregor-hype-trash-talk-nate-diaz I tend to agree with this analysis.
Martypants1 wrote: » Let's see if Gamebred comes back with meaningful stats this time of the height and reach differences of the fighters McGregor has actually fought.
John_D80 wrote: » Meaningful stats? Christ. Just a few hours ago you were claiming that Aldo was stripped of his belt for not fighting Conor and the UFC are faking pictures of RDA's foot and paying him backhanders not to fight!!! How about some meaningful stats to back up the absolute blather and outright lies you are spouting in here? You seriously do not have a clue judging by your posts mate. Its laughable
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Diaz lost the first round comfortably and was losing the first half of the 2nd round also. Then Conor got tired, slowed down and Nate unsurprisingly managed to find it easier to hit a target that was not moving much any more. Not sure I'd class that as outboxing someone. If Conor didn't gas so badly there's nothing to suggest he wouldn't have kept winning the stand up.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » I believe in boxing ali called it the rope a dope.