BattleCorp wrote: » Where else other than a hurling match can you go out and knock seven shades of sh1te out of someone with a stick and face no repercussions? I think there is a ball involved too but I think that is only incidental to the knocking the sh1te out of each other. Great stuff altogether.
diomed wrote: » The GAA banned people who played non-GAA sports. They might not like to hear that now, but that is what they did. You say supporting Irish jobs and industry. I say banning foreign manufactured sports equipment from the GAA. I didn't say anything about the church. Thanks for refuting my argument about the church. :pac:
CrabRevolution wrote: » The ban ended in 1971. What relevance is it today?
diomed wrote: » The rule ended but if you read this 2013 letter you will see there is still a ban in force. Read the third last paragraph.http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/rule-42-still-in-gaa-rules-29637619.html I see in that letter the ban by the GAA on soccer playing was not effective in Dublin as the GAA would have lost most of their players. GAA bans only work when you can intimidate.Does the GAA still ban the use of GAA grounds by other sports. Is there still a ban on Northern Ireland police from playing GAA?. My father was banned by the GAA. He had been a county player. He also played rugby and soccer. A happy outcome was he was one of a half dozen men that set up a soccer club in the town. That club is thriving today, new ground, new premises, a large number of teams in a number of leagues. You ask "What relevance has the ban today?" It showed the public that the GAA then was an organisation that tried to intimidate. They might try to say it is no longer relevant. Their actions differ. Why does GAA literature still say 32 county Ireland? Ireland is 26 counties. Northern Ireland is 6 counties. Do the GAA not recognise this state? Are they an organisation that is subversive to this state? Is the GAA a political organisation or is it a sports organisation?
ClovenHoof wrote: » It has been a very powerful pathological manipulation tool for politics in that it destroys a sense of national identity and replaces it with a county colours mindset. This is one of the reasons we are doomed as a nation as we are a collection of 32 little ****hole rivalries and not a nation of Irish people. Every culchie puts his parish ahead of his nation. Jackeens tend to be the only group in Ireland who are actually aware of what nation they are citizens of. But that is really more about politicians using the GAA rather than the sport itself.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Played by culchies or in the case of Dublin clubs children of culchiesDon't know any true blue Dub who really follows that sport
raze_them_all_ wrote: » Ice hockey says hello
diomed wrote: » The rule ended but if you read this 2013 letter you will see there is still a ban in force. Read the third last paragraph.http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/rule-42-still-in-gaa-rules-29637619.html You ask "What relevance has the ban today?" It showed the public that the GAA then was an organisation that tried to intimidate. They might try to say it is no longer relevant. Their actions differ.Why does GAA literature still say 32 county Ireland? Ireland is 26 counties. Northern Ireland is 6 counties. Do the GAA not recognise this state? Are they an organisation that is subversive to this state? Is the GAA a political organisation or is it a sports organisation?
CrabRevolution wrote: » If the GAA is such a bastion of FF and the church, why has it thrived in the North, where neither of those things ever held total sway?
RadiationKing wrote: » You mean why has a highly insular organisation that makes a big stink about Irishness thrived in a part of the island where a highly insular subset of the populace make a big stink about their Irishness? It's a real mystery alright! :pac:
armaghlad wrote: » What relevance has the ban now? Absolutely zilch. The bit in bold barely merits a response. I suppose you'll be lobbying the FAI and IRFU to withdraw players from NI on their teams, since you're such a stickler for the partition of this country?
Wichita Lineman wrote: » Like any organisation it has a lot of positives but there are also a lot of negatives. I loved playing hurling. The big negative for me at the moment is they brainwash small kids 6yrs and up that the GAA is the only sport(s) they should play. There is a shocking attitude shown towards soccer, rugby, golf etc (and many other activities).God forbid that little Johnny would turn into a star golfer instead of being a shoo in for taking his fathers spot at corner back in the local village Junior B team when he turns 17. Kids should be encouraged to take part in as many sports / activities as possible.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Played by culchies or in the case of Dublin clubs children of culchies Don't know any true blue Dub who really follows that sport
Kiwi in IE wrote: » I'm not sure if this is just our local club or nationwide, but I don't like the way kids have to play both sports, in order to play one. I'm not sure at what level it branches off into either football or hurling, but my 7 year old plays GAA, and loves football but hates hurling. In order to play football he has to also do hurling. He is very sporty and also does rugby and soccer, but he's being put off GAA, despite loving football and being good at it, because of the hurling. Is this the way it is everywhere or have we struck it unlucky with our local club? They are two quite distinctly different sports. It's kind of like having to play hockey as well in order to play rugby. Makes no sense to me!
washman3 wrote: » This is quite bizarre and definitely not the norm in any club that I'm aware of. Maybe some rural clubs are short on playing numbers and pressurise kids into playing both in order to field teams, but I've honestly not come across this before. It's always far easier to field a football team than a hurling one, as hurling requires far more skills coaching than football.