NIMAN wrote: » Didn't know that. Just assumed, wrongly.
Whosthis wrote: » Get fu<ked you ignorant <unt.
foggy_lad wrote: » before the councils and government get their act together and round up all these horses and euthanise them?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » If everyone travelled by sulky it would cut road deaths down considerably and would also help reduce pollution and carbon emissions. Edit. Oil wars would reduce too. Fuel for horses is locally sourced. Yes, if you don't support the banning of cars and a return to horses you're a supporter of war.
topmanamillion wrote: » Nonsense. It's like saying if people walked their 20 mile commute it would reduce pollution.
foggy_lad wrote: » Child Killed in Sulky Accident
Independent.ie wrote: Boy (11) killed when the pony and trap he was travelling on collided with truck
sup_dude wrote: » There is a huge need for more education regarding driving around animals. Some people are down right retarded when it comes to animals. I can't count the number of times I've been put into what could have been a fatal situation, and only got out of it because of either the horse I was in just happened to keep its cool, or from sheer luck. You will hear similar stories from every single horse rider. There is a chance that the sulky driver is to blame, there is a higher chance it was the driver at fault. It's terrifying the situations ignorant drivers (and cyclists but they also unknowingly put themselves at risk) can out you in, and on a shockingly regular basis.
Victor wrote: » On what grounds, and by who, has it been decided that this was an accident - some unpreventable, random incident? On what grounds, and by who, has it been decided that the pony and trap collided with the other vehicle, thereby implying blame on the deceased's part?
Rocket19 wrote: Oftentimes, the drivers of the sulkies do not consider the danger they impose to everyone involved (drivers of the sulky themselves, the people on the road and in their cars, and of the course, the poor horses). This is amplified by the fact that many of the 'drivers' are indeed children, who can't possibly anticipate or comprehend fully the consequences of their actions. It's why 'accidents' happen.
Rocket19 wrote: For you to imply that the general communitiy is at fault for lack of education is just plain wrong. I also do not agree that there is a "higher chance" the truck driver was at fault. These vehicles should not be allowed on the roads, full stop.
Johngoose wrote: » It is a terrible tragedy,but this ethnic group have been flaunting road traffic laws and maybe now they will realise that the rules of the road are there for a reason.Also is it responsible parenting leaving three young fellas on a horse and cart on a public road.Put "sulky race" into YouTube and you will see this ethnic group breaking all rules of the road as the guards follow them along main roads.They don't respect the law of the land,they recklessly endanger themselves and now we see the outcome of all of that.
sup_dude wrote: » I despise sulkies and their usual drivers. It makes my blood boil to see them. I am not by any means defending them (for the most part). The RSA are massively at fault because there is very very little education when learning to drive about approaching animals. Also, many people do not proceed with caution around horses and completely ignore rider signals. This is just a one incident out of many. Unfortunately, this one ended in the death of a child, but how many near misses is there on a daily basis?
Rocket19 wrote: However, it just isn't helpful to compare the situation of a safety conscious rider like you or me, where how the driver behaves on the road plays a big part in the safety aspect (not slowing down, speeding by the horse, etc). It's not the same situation. These are kids handling vehicles (horse and cart), and weaving them through traffic at high speed.
Rocket19 wrote: » These are kids handling vehicles (horse and cart), and weaving them through traffic at high speed. All the education in the world on the part of the driver (of the car) will not stop these incidents/accidents happening, as the horse and carts should not be there in the first place. There is nothing the driver of a car can do in this situation to minimise risk, bar stopping their vehicle together.
Torricelli wrote: » You want to kill the innocent horses? WTF, it's hardly their fault.
Nermal wrote: » Better to be euthanised than 'looked after' by travellers. Should be illegal to bring a horse inside the M50.
TG1 wrote: » I don't want to comment on the particular case as its still all unclear, a truck drivers life is irreversibly changed and a family have lost a child. But in general people who don't deal with horses have no idea how unpredictable they are. They deal with them the same as bikes when they come across them on the road, revving engines, trying to get past asap, ignore hand signals. They are big unpredictable flight animals, it will cost drivers two minutes max to let the rider/ person in control get to a spot they are comfertable with and allow the car to pass without danger. This needs to be highlighted, whether you come across a horse being ridden, driven or led, slow down, wait until you can give it a wide berth and heed any hand signals the person in control gives.
sup_dude wrote: » But we don't know that this was the case. Yes, children should not have been in control, but there is nothing to say that the cart/sulky/whatever it was was being weaved through traffic at speed.
TG1 wrote: » I disagree, it's not a vehicle its an animal, this is why it all gets even more dangerous. An animal will react to its surroundings, a vehicle will not. If a truck lets off an air brake or a car driver hits the horn there is a high chance an animal will spook, a vehicle will not. This is where the driver awareness comes into play, whether its my mare suited and booted and high vis everywhere from her browband to high vis strips on her back boots, or a hairy pony with a bit of rope through its mouth, drivers need to be aware they are not vehicles. Everyone need to know that they need a wider berth, and more care when approaching. If this means stopping for a minute then the driver should stop!
Nermal wrote: » Better to be euthanised than 'looked after' by travellers These children. Should be illegal to bring a horse inside the M50 Pale.
TG1 wrote: » But of a generalisation, you should pop out to the dunsink horse club... I wouldn't put any of those healthy happy well looked after animals down...
foggy_lad wrote: Weaving through traffic or not one thing we do know for sure is that if there were no sulkies and traps and illegal horses and ponies that child most certainly would not have died!
foggy_lad wrote: Would you hack on through the busiest traffic in the city with a horse or other animal? probably not?
foggy_lad wrote: When a child dies in such tragic circumstances I don't think laying blame in any direction is helpful and will not change what has happened but removing the horses and traps from the equation will prevent another child being killed or injured in accidents or by livestock roaming around housing estates and built up urban areas.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » That child should have been in school.
sup_dude wrote: » Removing dangerous/ignorant drivers would have a similar effect. Again, silly argument.