nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Do Females Watch Porn

Okay, I'm male and homosexual.

But I've always been curious about one thing. Is it only men who are dirty bastards. Is it something about our male make-up that has us having a 'one track mind'.

I'm extremely curious not only about straight males but about straight females.

Do women lust after the male form. If they do , then do they buy porn mags of muscular studs? If not , why not ?

Are women less superficial than men ? And I mean superficial in the physical sense. Does a woman look at a big chested muscular guy and completely disregarded his physical form and just look to see if he's a nice guy.

And I have to ask, do heterosexual women masturbate? Do they masturbate over pics or videos of men.

If they don't that's fine. But why not? Why do men do it and woman don't ( if that's the case).

I have this sneaking suspicion that women are just the same sexual animals as men are in their thoughts but they keep it to themselves to show that they are somehow superior in some sense.

I could be totally wrong, but it does amuse me to think about women who wear sexy boots down the high street walking in threesomes looking sexy. I'd go for some of them myself If I was straight.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

howamidifferent

Tilly wrote: »

Why?

Duh! :eek: Womans likes porn shocker! :pac:

Cupcake_Crisis wrote: »

Did you know that women like sex just as much as men? Crazy I know, but it's true!

I'm not doubting your assertion, I literally don't care but since sex drive isn't equall among members of the same sex how are you so sure it is equal between the genders? Are there any studies to verify this?

Well, the poet Yeats wrote a poem about that:

Fair and foul are near of kin,
And fair needs foul,' I cried.

'A woman can be proud and stiff
When on love intent;
But Love has pitched his mansion in
The place of excrement;
For nothing can be sole or whole
That has not been rent.'

Arghus wrote: »

I don't think misandry is to blame for this. How many jiggling boobies have you seen on magazine covers, or in countless movies - They're everywhere sure! Seen many pictures of throbbing errect cocks? When the ratio is 60-40 in favour of mickeys, I then might say... Yes, we do live in a misandric society.

I think it's got more to do with men being conditioned by society into being uncomfortable thinking about female sexuality. The ability to want and to get sex is still seen by society as a key-part of male identity.

I work with a lot of guys in their early twenties and they have a great old time "bantering" each other about their porno habits. But if you ever throw them a curve-ball, about womens porn watching habits they'll get weirdly uncomfortable about it.

Exactly. I think this over-arching narrative that men are sexually depraved and women are angels is all in the head.

LexieOnRale wrote: »

I like watching porn for the lol factor too, (fake taxi)

OMG fake taxi is hilarious!!!

howamidifferent wrote: »

PM sent. :cool:

Why?

howamidifferent

maudgonner wrote: »

I agree. But downstairs regions are not the most aesthetically pleasing either really. There's a reason it's called 'bumping uglies' :pac:

If an argument is needed against intelligent design, I reckon that would be it.

yep, nothing intelligent about siting the sewer next to the playground.

Candie wrote: »

When I find some porn that features a man rubbing the womans tum-tum when she's eaten too much, then carrying her to the sofa and handing her the remote before he puts out the bins, I'll be glued to it.

Otherwise I have to say I find it spectacularly unerotic and mechanical to watch. I also worry about the performers, which may or may not be warranted but still affects how I process porn.

This can only mean that I'm frigid and repressed and all that negative stuff, right? That's how these kinds of threads usually go.

See. That's the first and only comment about anyone being 'frigid' and 'repressed' for not liking porn in the thread.

So I guess you have nothing to worry about.

kfallon wrote: »

How do people get turned on by feet? They are manky looking yokes!

Legs, defo, can't beat them! Feet...gtfo :mad:

I agree. But downstairs regions are not the most aesthetically pleasing either really. There's a reason it's called 'bumping uglies' :pac:

If an argument is needed against intelligent design, I reckon that would be it.

Did you know that women like sex just as much as men? Crazy I know, but it's true!

I haven't read the entire thread so I'm probably way off the mark here but yeah, I as a woman don't find porn degrading to women. As long as nobody is being exploited, no harm done. I personally like watching porn but only with someone else. I like watching porn for the lol factor too, (fake taxi)

Do women look at men the same way at men look at women? I don't know. Maybe. I don't know what's up with me today but I'm seeing rides all around the place. There was a man wearing a suit on the train today, he was unreal, and although he didn't know it, he was having the time of his life in my head. The cashier at the local shop. A man walking past the window. I have been very busy all morning objectifying men. I usually wouldn't see as many attractive people, to be honest. I feel drunk

Ah a thread about how males and females.....sorry men and women are different. These always go well.

When I find some porn that features a man rubbing the womans tum-tum when she's eaten too much, then carrying her to the sofa and handing her the remote before he puts out the bins, I'll be glued to it.

Otherwise I have to say I find it spectacularly unerotic and mechanical to watch. I also worry about the performers, which may or may not be warranted but still affects how I process porn.

This can only mean that I'm frigid and repressed and all that negative stuff, right? That's how these kinds of threads usually go.

howamidifferent

Tilly wrote: »

Yup I watch porn, probably 3-4 times a week.

PM sent. :cool:

Mod

Jaysus, will ye move on. The OP already apologised for the use of the word

IvyTheTerrible wrote: »

So nitpicking language is annoying if it agrees with your world view but not the other way round? Rightio.

I may find nitpicking annoying, but I also find irony delicious.

But hey, I'm just a silly, fickle female.

anitaca wrote: »

they used females, women, men, males. why do you not lambaste them for the use of male?

I don't like the use of "males" used on it's own to refer to men either. It was the title that stuck out to me.

Not only do women watch porn, I know straight women who watch gay male porn because they are aroused by the dynamic of seeing a man being dominated or subjicated (if that is the right word). Different stokes for different folks, always

IvyTheTerrible wrote: »

Because female can refer to any species. Woman refers to humans.
Female is an adjective and by using it to refer to women, it's not only grammatically incorrect but it reduces women to their reproductive parts and abilities.
But go on, keep telling me why you think I shouldn't be annoyed by a word that doesn't refer to you in a dehumanising way. :rolleyes:

they used females, women, men, males. why do you not lambaste them for the use of male?

maudgonner wrote: »

I can only chip in my perspective, but as a female woman I don't find the word dehumanising at all. I do get quite annoyed at people who nitpick language though, no offence intended to you.

ETA: If I wanted to nitpick language, by the way, I'd point out that female is both a noun and an adjective.

So nitpicking language is annoying if it agrees with your world view but not the other way round? Rightio.

kfallon wrote: »

I doubt many cats and dogs read Boards (a forum for humans) so seen as all members are human I would take it for granted that female refers to the human species!

"Do Bitches Watch Porn" would probably earn a ban :pac:

I doubt many cats and dogs read Boards (a forum for humans) so seen as all members are human I would take it for granted that female refers to the human species!

If any dogs and cats do read Boards regularly then I apologise for the above sweeping generalisation and if you could PM me, I have a few questions I'd like answered regarding licking myself..... :pac:

The Backwards Man wrote: »

Tractor porn

Topless tractor porn :eek:

IvyTheTerrible wrote: »

Because female can refer to any species. Woman refers to humans.
Female is an adjective and by using it to refer to women, it's not only grammatically incorrect but it reduces women to their reproductive parts and abilities.
But go on, keep telling me why you think I shouldn't be annoyed by a word that doesn't refer to you in a dehumanising way. :rolleyes:

I can only chip in my perspective, but as a female woman I don't find the word dehumanising at all. I do get quite annoyed at people who nitpick language though, no offence intended to you.

ETA: If I wanted to nitpick language, by the way, I'd point out that female is both a noun and an adjective.

The Backwards Man

pickarooney wrote: »

In what way is it dehumanising? It's a perfectly normal word, with no malice or negative connotation. He refers to himself as a male three words in. Where does this idea that 'female' is a bad word come from?

Because female can refer to any species. Woman refers to humans.
Female is an adjective and by using it to refer to women, it's not only grammatically incorrect but it reduces women to their reproductive parts and abilities.
But go on, keep telling me why you think I shouldn't be annoyed by a word that doesn't refer to you in a dehumanising way. :rolleyes:

IvyTheTerrible wrote: »

Why didn't he say that then? "Females" referring to women is very dehumanizing.

In what way is it dehumanising? It's a perfectly normal word, with no malice or negative connotation. He refers to himself as a male three words in. Where does this idea that 'female' is a bad word come from?

Good gracious - I tried it, of course - there IS "Tractor porn". Quite a lot of it. Who knew??

But as regards feet, that's an old one.
For myself, I would not fancy a chunk of anyone's sweaty bunion and toenails in my mouth: but there's nowt so quare as folks!

-- once I was in San Francisco with Mr March and there was a fellow with a comfy chair out on the pavement, offering free foot massages to ladies. Possibly the most blissful fifteen minutes of my life!!

Shivvv wrote: »

If you're interested in female sexuality you could do worse than read My Secret Garden by Nancy Friday.

Does it have pictures?

If you're interested in female sexuality you could do worse than read My Secret Garden by Nancy Friday.