Gamebred wrote: » UFC doesnt care about what fights to make on past achievements,they are in the entertainment business to make money,sooner people realise this the better,the most deserving fighters dont get what is deserved if he was ko'd in a minute it'd make no difference he'd probably still get RDA or Lawler for the simple fact people will buy it.
newbbieb wrote: » It might be sellable as Conor was too heavy and 55 he is more natural weight,it would also depend on how he loses possibly,if Diaz decimated him it would be a hard sell on a Dos Anjos fight when he ran through Nate not that long ago. Either way its disappointing i was looking forward to Conor either ending the wrestler question or just confirming it to be true with the RDA fight,but until he beats someone like Dos Anjos he will always have the doubters which is understandable to some degree,according to Bisping Conors winning streak is down to the luck of getting so many short camp fighters.
Gamebred wrote: » Its a game of opinions Conor will never get the credit no matter what he does,if he ko'd Lawler they would start saying hes ducking Rockhold,its no fault of his own these people keep dropping out not easy for him not knowing who hes fighting, His wins over Poirier and Holloway alone are legit as any ko'd one and dominated the other with one knee,both are both about 11-0 since I dont think he has anything to prove,others do.
newbbieb wrote: » Totally agree man,its very unfortunate for Conor and he has always stepped up when most fighters turn down these late changes like Poirer recently did. Hollaway was short notice i think though wasn't he,and its disappointing to hear Bisping put forward this kind of narrative about Conor and this fight will just feed more into that even if he wins.
newbbieb wrote: » Its exactly what you were saying you clown.When you get annoyed by someone instead of countering them you say"insufferable McGregor fans" if they are so stupid and insufferable you should be able to counter them with your superior mma knowledge instead of resorting to insults.Its cheap insults you resort to when you got no argument,you keep saying its not what you were saying when its exactly what you were saying,i must be talking with the dumbest guy on these boards,enough.
StringerBell wrote: »
Caliden wrote: » I think those Bisping comments came before it was announced McGregor would be going up a weight class. He's hardly 'lucky' to find out he has a week to bulk up. While Nate hasn't a great record to date - he's taller,heavier and has a reach advantage. All of which McGregor had over most of his previous opponents.
JustTheOne wrote: » Doubt we will see him at 145 again.
Gamebred wrote: » Diaz aint small,know he got merked in this fight just thought it'd give people an idea how big he is.
Gamebred wrote: » Conor will use the same gameplan he used against mendes,butcher the body and empty his gas tank I reckon.
evo2000 wrote: » RDA is the one that is small the man is 5'7 and alot of people then ranting about the size difference at LW lol mcgregor would have mauled RDA
Davei141 wrote: » Ye RDA didn't stand a chance with the giant McGregoat towering over him with a '1 height advantage.
Update: today's event at UFC GYM Torrance changed to formal 196 press conference at 1pm PT. Open to public. Live at http://UFC.com
Billy86 wrote: » Conor is on Conan tonight? Have to watch that, I barely get around to watching him but Conan's one of the best interviewers out there; really adaptable to whoever his guest is and highly entertaining - it should be a great watch.