Mountainsandh wrote: » marmurr I have explained in my posts that I am computer literate, have no problem using the internet, I know my Eircode by heart, and have no difficulty typing it in. My argument is not about myself having difficulty typing my Eircode, but the people around me.
marmurr1916 wrote: » Exactly. It's not very hard to write your Eircode on a piece of paper and tape it to your fridge or to the mantlepiece or wherever it is that people write down and store information that they refer to frequently. And it's bloody insulting to older people in Ireland to assume that they're less capable of older people in the UK or anywhere else of remembering a postcode of seven characters or less capable of writing it down and keeping it handy for reference.
ukoda wrote: » I think you're underestimating the older generation, they are more than capable of remembering or storing their eircode somewhere prominently and they can use it ambulance calls, dealing on the phone with government departments, giving it to people for directions and generally making use of it when required in their current lives. If they don't like tech or don't used tech, then no postcode design is going to be of use to them online. In the scenario of "typing it into to an online form" I can tell you right now, if they are capable of getting on to the lidl site or any other website it is very disrespectful of you to claim they would then be incapable of typing their eircode Into a box if such a service was available. If they are elderly people who are tech savvy, they can use eircode online. If they are not tech savvy then they have no need to use eircode online and therefore can use it in their phone interactions or face to face.
Mountainsandh wrote: » , I bet my mil and these colleagues would all already be using it, and there wouldn't be an issue. Wouldn't that have been brilliant ? I really do believe that had the sequence been meaningful to these people, regardless of how tech savvy they are, in their every day life, online or not, they would have adopted it and made use of it. They're not people who are opposed to change, or unable for it, it's just that change needs to be useful and intuitive. Useful and intuitive are not adjective that can qualify Eircodes right now.
Mountainsandh wrote: » No, they will say : "God, errr... jeee... I know I got one but I don't have a clue what it is, turn left at the pub and it's the second house on your right."
Mountainsandh wrote: » But these people adopted the change because it was intuitive. Marmurr reply away to yourself then.
Mountainsandh wrote: » But these people adopted the change because it was intuitive. Plus it's voluntary, optional. Marmurr reply away to yourself then.
Mountainsandh wrote: » Great, brilliant for the people you guys know. Not the case for the people I know. Hell, even the people my age don't know. Even Mr M doesn't know, although I'm after reminding him more time than I can remember. Not a hierarchical code I'm on about. One that would be meaningful, and possibly even use reference prefixes that are already known, like has been suggested, possibly county initials like car number plates. It is disingenuous to claim that the 7 random letters + numbers is as easy to remember as a sequence that would have meaning and use pre-known codes. I said I'd leave the discussion again and should have done so a few posts ago. Profit motive it seems is the wild card to implementation of whatever is needed for companies to thrive, and supersedes the needs, preference, or convenience of society in general. This is something that the little sample of demographics in the Boards "Infrastructure" forum is comfortable with, and I can't reconcile my views with this, so I'll leave you guys to rub your hands and pat your respective backs. Enjoy.
ukoda wrote: » What a childish post. "People don't agree with me so I'm going to call them names and run off"
Sam Russell wrote: » Mod: Do not attack the poster.
Mountainsandh wrote: » I guess the idea of implementation though, is that Eircode would be used in every day life, rather than be entered once a year like an insurance company number. Yes, my older relatives and colleagues who are very much inconvenienced with random Eircodes so far could locate it and type it in the odd time. It's not really what implementation is about though, isn't it ? It's not disrespectful, it's just looking around me, at people who are not inclined to even try to remember Eircode, because it is random. And again it's not me guessing, it's just as part of discussions, they tell me how nonsensical and useless they think it is (in not so correct language). If it had been county initials, 2 digits, local letters, 2 digits for example, I bet my mil and these colleagues would all already be using it, and there wouldn't be an issue. Wouldn't that have been brilliant ? I really do believe that had the sequence been meaningful to these people, regardless of how tech savvy they are, in their every day life, online or not, they would have adopted it and made use of it. They're not people who are opposed to change, or unable for it, it's just that change needs to be useful and intuitive. Useful and intuitive are not adjectives that can qualify Eircodes right now.
Mr Griffin also told the committee that Electric Ireland would start issuing bills with Eircodes from next Monday.
chewed wrote: » One thing I'm seeing more regularly is the old and new postcodes being repeated on addresses in Dublin. For example... ABC Company 1 Blanchardstown Rd. Dublin 15 D15 1234 Ireland Surely there's no need for the "15" after "Dublin" if the Eircode is displaying this number?
moyners wrote: » An Post are insisting you include both. I've seen anecdotal stuff on here and twitter of An Post putting "incorrect address" stickers where the old Dublin XX has been left off and just the eircode on its own. Stupidity
BoatMad wrote: » I filled in 5 online forms today for various things , all either displayed my Eircode, or asked me for it , ( including my heating oil delivery) Looks like its being implemented all over the place
plodder wrote: » You're actually raising a different issue there - the fact that postal boundaries don't correspond with administrative ones and your postcode refers to Darlington while you live in Durham. But, it seems wrong to argue that there is no meaning in DL = Darlington (or BT = Belfast, or IV = Inverness) just because the closest city to you is a different one. I assume that you don't live in DL 11 though because this information is free in the UK, I can see exactly where DL11 is, and it's the other side of Darlington from Durham. http://www.postcodearea.co.uk/postaltowns/darlington/dl11/ It even has its own wikipedia pagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DL_postcode_area
plodder wrote: » I assume that you don't live in DL 11 though because this information is free in the UK, I can see exactly where DL11 is, and it's the other side of Darlington from Durham. http://www.postcodearea.co.uk/postaltowns/darlington/dl11/
marmurr1916 wrote: » I'm not raising a different issue. The other poster said that it would be better if Eircodes included reference to county names and local areas because then they would have meaningful links with local areas and be easier to remember rather than a string of random characters. I've pointed out that UK postcodes have reference to town names etc but that these aren't necessarily meaningful, so not necessarily easier to remember and, as I've already said, for most people UK postcodes may as well be a string of random characters. BT is a particularly poor example - BT stands for Belfast. I'm not sure what meaningful local connection someone in Co. Fermanagh is supposed to derive from that.