TheNap wrote: » What the hell is his missus doing holding his hand on the way to court ? Honestly.
Oranage2 wrote: » 15 is a very borderline age, I wouldn't do it myself but a 15 year old would be able to sexually reproduce as well as some of them at that age can be pretty, again I don't think what Johnson did was right but I don't think what he did was a horrible crime.
MD1990 wrote: » Are you feeling okay. Johnson is a disgrace. I hope he gets his headed kicked in when he goes to Prison.
Baldy Conscience wrote: » nonces are usually put with other nonces. Not with the general population, even other criminals won't put up with nonces. Unlike this thread.
Coat22 wrote: » See it bull sh*t like this others were talking about earlier - complete over reaction. Yeah the guy broke the law and should be punished. Yeah he seems a complete waster of space and utter ar$ehole. But spare us all the " good decent criminals won't put up with the likes of these guys" guff. He did whatever he did. He'll be probably jailed. He did what he did with a girl who if she were 10 months older there would be no police investigation or people on here calling for his balls to be chopped off. That doesn't excuse it but the usual pitchforks and faux internet outrage is alive on this thread today.
Iang87 wrote: » I think the same with any of these cases its the knowing you're doing wrong and very wrong that causes the issue. If you dont think he'll get a hiding in jail for it you're mistaken. Theres a reason why so many sexual offenders are housed seperately in prison
Iang87 wrote: » I mean after he was arrested. I assume he didnt rock on one day and tell the chairman I'm texting this 15 year old hoping for a bit on the side
DaveSuarez wrote: » Probably hoping he gets locked up so she'll have sole access to the bank accounts.
Deleted User wrote: » That's harsh. Her character really shouldn't be a matter for speculation, she's standing by the father of her child. She has not answered any questions as to her motives - nor should she - so to assume she is some gold digger is just a presumption and she shouldn't be judged on that. Unlike Johnson, who will be judged on the testimony...
vicwatson wrote: » Sickens me that, just like Darina Allen standing by her man!! Vomit
murpho999 wrote: » It's not apologists or downplaying. He has commited a crime, he will be punished. What more do you want? I wouldn't go as far to call him a paedophile due to her age. In other countries in Europe the age is 14, so it's a grey area.
CSF wrote: » Arguments of 'this sexual offence is worse than this sexual offence' rarely go well. No need to decide whether it's Adam Johnson or Rolf Harris or Jimmy Saville has committed the worst offence. They're all paedophiles and the court will determine their punishments relative to the severity and frequency of their crimes.
tim_holsters wrote: » It's a classic case of grooming there simply are no mitigating factors that can make Johnson look any "less" of an offender. Doesn't matter a fcuk that she wasn't 5 or 6 or whatever, can't understand why some folk can't get their head around this.
OwaynOTT wrote: » He's not a paedophile though. Is he not a ephebophile?
Flint Fredstone wrote: » 5 or 6 is much, much worse than 15 tbf.