LordSutch wrote: » English was by far the main form of communicatiuon in Ireland in the 1920s, surely you can't argue with that? I think you're heading down a dead end there Noddin. Del.Monte is right.
Dirty Dingus McGee wrote: » The reason for that is because Irish was actively discriminated against by the British ruling class in this country.
bmm wrote: » TG4 have the rights to show the rugby currently (Pro 12). The commentary is in Irish only . Really, really annoying when you cannot understand what is being said :mad: On the Welsh tv channels there is an English commentary option , which seems sensible. Why give rugby lovers another reason to hate Irish ?
Dirty Dingus McGee wrote: » Or we'd be a completely bilingual country.
TheBigEvil wrote: » We are naturally English speaking...
TheBigEvil wrote: » Anyway, thank fook we speak English...
Coles wrote: » Yeah, imagine trying to watch Sky Sports Extra Plus Plus with subtitles! And 'Celebrity Strictly Come Dancing on Ice' just wouldn't be right in anything else except English. It would be unnatural.
Wibbs wrote: » " A diversity of tongues is not of benefit; it was imposed on mankind as a curse at the building of Babel. " Daniel O'Connell the Liberator.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » I would take crap reality TV over pretentious cultural purists any day.
Coles wrote: » I don't doubt that for a second. :rolleyes:
Coles wrote: » You actually believe that? ffs. Were you educated in Utah?
Me, earlier wrote: I happen to disagree with him BTW.
Ferris_Bueller wrote: » How would it effect the kids and their education? I don't think it would effect their education at all, if anything I would guess it would only further their education. Maybe as some of you are saying it isn't worth the hassle of trying to revive the language to the majority, and for this reason it will probably never happen, but to say it would effect their education is untrue.
Also, would the state not have a right to do that? At the moment Irish is compulsory in schools so they are already 'forcing them' to learn it.. If I stated they don't have a right to force my kids to speak English would I have a leg to stand on?
Iwasfrozen wrote: » A misplaced sense of superiority is a very unfortunate thing.
Wibbs wrote: » I happen to disagree with him. That's three times now. How many more repetitions will it require before it sinks in?
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » English is a lifeskill [sic], irish [sic] is not. When a country is pretty muhc [sic] 100% fluent English speaking, place [sic] emphasis on a different lanaguge [sic] is impractical.
ToddyDoody wrote: » I'm sure this has changed a bit in the last while but generally the perception has been that no-one in Dublin has any time for Gaeilge.
Coles wrote: » You've said that twice now.
What?! Why did you quote him if you disagree with him?!
Coles wrote: » What would France be without French?
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » I have no idea what you mean.
Wibbs wrote: » Christ. *bangs head off desk*. For god's sake man it's called illustrating a point. You do realise that a quote may be used to illustrate an opposing position one does not agree with? Surely? Have I stumbled onto some oddball forum version of the Joe Duffy show here? And you feel you can claim some sense of superiority? *facepalm*
Wibbs wrote: » Try reading some history there. A good start would be around the standardisation of the French language and how so many native languages were actively killed off. Spain had similar. No English involved either.
Coles wrote: » Now I'm confused.
Wibbs wrote: » At least you're honest.
Deleted User wrote: » Anyone would.think coles was a candidate for membership of a subclass with learning difficulties eh?
Coles wrote: » Hang on! I'm not the one who couldn't speak a language after 14 years of learning it. :P