gramar wrote: » That answer is along the lines of: 'about three fiddy' (whatever the fuq that is about)
Squall Leonhart wrote: » That's where it came from!!
bodice ripper wrote: » I have never heard One Direction, it's easily done.
Tarzana2 wrote: » And I subsequently discovered that he was very famous and in the news a lot but at the time... genuinely not a clue.
Medusa22 wrote: » I often don't know which famous person someone is talking about, and it's genuine, going to the hairdresser is a nightmare because I don't watch Xfactor/Dancing with the Stars/ I'm a Celebrity, Get me out of here or TOWIE etc. I don't watch tv very often because I usually watch netflix or I download shows and films so I'm not exposed to many ads and I rarely listen to the radio. I read the newspaper online alright and I browse boards/facebook. However, it means that a lot of celebrities, especially pop singers are completely unknown to me and people look baffled when I don't know who someone is and they think I'm being a hipster.
osarusan wrote: » There was a thread recently about worst comedians, and I didn't recognise the names of a good few people mentioned
Sanity_Saviour wrote: » Every time a thread comes up about someone that everyone in the world knows (the Justin Biebers, One Direction, Rihanna etc.), the first comment is "Who?"
Sanity_Saviour wrote: » Every time a thread comes up about someone that everyone in the world knows (the Justin Biebers, One Direction, Rihanna etc.), the first comment is "Who?" or "I've never heard of them". Is it a point of pride not to be involved in popular culture? Do these people think that appearing as if they are isolated from the popular stratosphere will actually provide them with an elevated social standing (on the internet)? Or, is it just pure unfettered smugness?
RayM wrote: » *Ok, I'm slightly proud of the fact that I don't know who 'the Kardashians' are, how they became famous or what they're famous for.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » People's IQs are higher right now than at any point in human history. It's also worth pointing out that every generation thinks the next one's music and popular culture is complete nonsense in comparison to their own. It requires a very selective memory about what was popular when that person was a kid themselves. Have a gander at the top ten charts for any random time in the 80s or 90s, it was complete and utter pabulum, not one iota different from now.
HalloweenJack wrote: » I live in Spain, I don't watch telly, I don't have twitter so don't follow celeb updates, I'm not interested in chart music, I don't follow any telly shows religiously and ditto for films or film series It's perfectly possible for me to not know who certain pop culture figures are. But at the same time, I don't see the need to go round mentioning that in every thread.
Azalea wrote: » It's significantly different in my opinion. Sure, there was crap in the charts in the 80s and 90s, but nowhere near to the same extent as today, due to the X Factor et al. Chart music of the late 70s/early 80s comprised a lot of stuff that is considered absolutely classic now.
RayM wrote: » There's an awful lack of catchy tunes in the charts nowadays. Even the truly shite songs in the 80s and 90s had a tendency to get 'stuck' in your head (whether you wanted them to or not). Chart music now just seems over-produced and bland.
RayM wrote: » There's an awful lack of catchy tunes in the charts nowadays. Even the truly shite songs in the 80s and 90s had a tendency to get 'stuck' in your head (whether you wanted them to or not). Chart music now just seems over-produced and bland. It's all about the money (money... money).
Flippyfloppy wrote: » What do you DO during siesta etc?