Faith+1 wrote: » I Really wish they'd ban dole threads in After Hours. I get it! There's always gonna be lazy b*stards who don't want to work! Fcuk sake.
kneemos wrote: » Any food manufacturing employer wouldn't allow jewellery of any sort,apart from a plain wedding band. Poor practice for a restaurant also,obviously jewellery can harbour germs or end up in food.
lanos wrote: » its not a dole thread its a piercing thread fool
Mozzeltoff wrote: » Well look man, the restaurant managers didn't seem to have a problem with it. I never wear jewellery when I am working but some people do and until management tell them there's a problem, they're going to wear it.
lanos wrote: » so you would have nothing useful to advise really
the fact is that if you look up any job in situations vacant in the newspaper or in the FAS office not 1 employer from these sources would hire somebody with piercings such as hers. maybe she could get a job in a fish gutting factory. its hardly a career though.
your view of the world is a noble one i'll admit but it bears no resemblance to the reality for job seekers.
BTW are you pierced?
Faith+1 wrote: » Maybe you should read what the Op said? The girl was on a show about people on the dole and how is she execpted to get a job? Fool!
Fluffy Cat 88 wrote: » Horrible! Thing is, I don't mind tattoos (good ones not cheap diy ****e ones), pierced lips etc but those tunnels are disgusting.
Fluffy Cat 88 wrote: » Apparently they stink too. There's a young lad working in a chipper in town who has them and I avoid ordering food from him because they turn my stomach.
Links234 wrote: » You know what my attitude is? I don't like stretched earlobes, so I didn't get my earlobes stretched.
One eyed Jack wrote: » understandably because you actually can't speak for anyone as an employer, but yourself. The fact is that you can't speak for anyone as an employer, but yourself. And for the third time in a row, the fact is, that you can't speak for anyone as an employer, but yourself.
lanos wrote: » I am the OP BTW - just mentioning the fact that the girl was on the dole doesn't make it a dole thread the dole aspect is just incidental
Kovu wrote: » Otherwise why mention the programme at all?
lanos wrote: » its not a dole thread its a piercing threadfool
eternal wrote: » Also calling other posters fools is a bit much to be fair.
lanos wrote: » the term fool is pretty tame and positively harmless on After Hours and it was in response to a poster who effectively dismissed the participants of the TV show as 'lazy b*stards'
lanos wrote: » lets try a different approach 2 people equally qualified one is clean cut and conventional the other is pierced and alternative who gets the job ?
eternal wrote: » The girl expresses herself through her 'look'. She clearly stated she self harmed and was suicidal at times
Kovu wrote: » I have stretched earlobes (admittedly only 10mm) , tattoos and piercings. Never had any trouble with them at work.
Kovu wrote: » Because if I said 00 gauge, a lot of people wouldn't know what I was on about. The actual size of the plug/tunnel can also vary between 9-10mm depending on the manufacturer as well. Usually ones which are made in Europe are in mm & US ones in inches.
Kovu wrote: » However you were insinuating that nobody would want to employ her, ergo she will be on the dole. Otherwise why mention the programme at all?
lanos wrote: » why are you backing up Faith +1 that it is a dole thread its a piercing thread and more specifically about stretched lobes and that's why you are posting because you have stretched lobes too
Kovu wrote: » You could have just said you were watching a programme on tv and noticed a girl had stretched lobes, instead of insinuating that she was unemployable and should just give up looking for a job.
lanos wrote: » and I still say that the chance of employment with visible body art/modifications such as facial tattoos, piercings or lobe stretching will greatly reduce the chances of employment in today's competitive environment and render an unskilled person virtually unemployable.
lanos wrote: » yes I could I suppose I was a bit annoyed at Faith+1's attitude that dole threads should be banned. the thread was more than that. and I still say that the chance of employment with visible body art/modifications such as facial tattoos, piercings or lobe stretching will greatly reduce the chances of employment in today's competitive environment and render an unskilled person virtually unemployable. and actually when I was watching the program, while the girl was confiding that she really wanted to be normal. I was actually speaking to the TV saying:well then get yourself in front of a mirror girl and remove all that crap
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » You come across like a 60 year old from Leitrim.
sonny.knowles wrote: » Why are taxpayers paying for this stuff?