lanos wrote: » its not a dole thread its a piercing thread fool
kneemos wrote: » Any food manufacturing employer wouldn't allow jewellery of any sort,apart from a plain wedding band. Poor practice for a restaurant also,obviously jewellery can harbour germs or end up in food.
Faith+1 wrote: » I Really wish they'd ban dole threads in After Hours. I get it! There's always gonna be lazy b*stards who don't want to work! Fcuk sake.
endacl wrote: » Because 10mm sounds bigger than 1cm? :pac:
Mozzeltoff wrote: » Anything she wanted to do if she put her mind to it. Her ears aren't going to stop her. Someone said in an earlier post she wouldn't be able to work with food. Eh, I worked in a restaurant last year and a Chef De Partie had tunnels in and no one said a word to him about it.
One eyed Jack wrote: » C. I'd ask her what jobs she was interested in herself, then take a look at her CV to see what experience and qualifications she had, and what experience and qualifications she might need to get into the career she was interested in, and advise her on that basis, before I'd give a damn about her physical appearance.
Kovu wrote: » I have stretched earlobes (admittedly only 10mm) , tattoos and piercings. Never had any trouble with them at work.
lanos wrote: » ok if this girl approached you looking for advice she was worried that her appearance would put off potential employers A. would you advise her to remove the 'jewellery' and get reconstructive surgery for the gaping holes in her lobes or B. provide a list of occupations she could reasonably aspire to that would be accepting of her alternative lookif B, then can you provide us with a sample of suggested careers
lanos wrote: » ok if this girl approached you looking for advice she was worried that her appearance would put off potential employers A. would you advise her to remove the 'jewellery' and get reconstructive surgery for the gaping holes in her lobes or B. provide a list of occupations she could reasonably aspire to that would be accepting of her alternative look if B, then can you provide us with a sample of suggested careers
One eyed Jack wrote: » Joking aside, I wouldn't consider someone unemployable solely based on their jewellery. It'd depend entirely on what industry she would like to work in.
kneemos wrote: » She couldn't work with food products with those rings in and without them the ear looks hideous. Probably a lot of customer related positions that they wouldn't be appropriate for. Some supermarkets don't allow jewellery either I think.
One eyed Jack wrote: » They're not for stretching earlobes, they're placeholders for a cock.
vagazzled wrote: » Have you nothing else to start a thread about?A Saturday night and you are having a go at a young 20 year old girl who at least got a job (no mean feat in this economy if you are young without exp & qualifications.) Ok, she lost it- she didn't organise her 9 mile bus commute, but she will learn from the mistake. Your type are a dying breed, thank fook.
The Dogs Bollix wrote: » Here we go again. A dole thread Some people don't need piercings Some people don't need tattoos Some people don't smoke Some people don't drink Etc Etc And it doesn't make a blind bit of difference
lanos wrote: » program on RTE 2 now about irish people on the dole and theres this girl with multiple piercings and these hideous earlobe stretching things how does this girl expect anybody to employ her image below is not same as girl on RTE2