One eyed Jack wrote: » I'm just not his friend is all, I prefer to keep that boundary in place between myself as an adult, and my child, and then my child's friends. I still call my parents in law Mr. and Mrs., because I'm not their friend either, I'm their son in law, and obviously then I still call my mother Mam or Ma :pac:
foggy_lad wrote: » Jaysus talking about a barrel that is exactly where our bodies would've been found if we ever dared to address an older relative neighbour or parents friend by their first name(even if they told us to it was expected we would ignore their instruction and fall back on what our parents had thought us about being respectful to our elders). We were always told that when we were adults we could make our own decisions on what we called our parents friends and neighbours! We were children and were expected and thought to behave as children and not as little mini adults!
eviltwin wrote: » You can still have boundaries. Using Mr doesn't change that. It doesn't mean they respect you anymore either. And you should be friends if possible with your family, to a point, I don't need to hear about their sex lives or anything but I love hanging out with my daughter and in laws, they are some of my favourite people in the world.
One eyed Jack wrote: » I was just never comfortable with the idea of calling them by their first names eviltwin tbh. I know where you're coming from and all but I'd feel it was disrespectful. It's just a personal thing that I prefer is all, and my wife's parents are used to it by now 17 years later, and my son and his friends don't mind. I know it's old fashioned and all the rest of it but it's what I'm comfortable with, and I just wouldn't feel comfortable with anything else, and I get on with them all just the same as I would anyone else. I don't feel any particular need to be a barrel of laughs or anything else. It's hard to explain
eviltwin wrote: » Hey, if that's what works then you don't have to justify it. I know a lot of people who feel the same and they are far from being fuddy duddy, it's just their thing, we all have one. Do you not find it weird at family occasions having that level of formality though? Does it not make it hard to relax?
Savage Tyrant wrote: » My step kids call me by my first name... But would refer to me as their Dad if talking about me to someone else. My biological kids still call me Daddy though and I'd not be happy if they used my name. I always call my Mum and Dad exactly that, unless I'm messing about.
Satts wrote: » My son calls me by my name. He had a speech delay, so long waiting for him to speak, so he can call me anything he likes, just glad to hear him talking.
terryduff12 wrote: » I remember hearing guy on Sean Moncrieff that does the parenting as he said about it every body can call you Joe, Paddy, Lisa or whoever buts its your kids who get to call you Mum and Dad no one else
miss tickle wrote: » A bit self serving and conditioned don't you think. Parent's have a special connection with their children, it is not necessary for them to have a formal way of addressing each other. Surely the first name which establishes this connection is the most apt.
One eyed Jack wrote: » I'm genuinely curious as to why you would suggest that children addressing their parents by their first names is any more apt that addressing them as Mam and Dad, let alone that you would suggest being on a first name basis with their parents is the most apt? I have to be honest, the first time I heard a four year old refer to his parents by calling his mother by her first name, I did a double take as I wasn't sure what just happened! :pac: It's just as conditioned to have your children call you by your first name, and if that's not the very definition of self-serving, encouraging children to see adults as their equals, I'm not sure how you could say encouraging them to refer to their parents as Mam and Dad could be any more self-serving?