beno619 wrote: » He was good, but most of the top players in the PL underperformed, he was the best of a bad bunch.
Pro. F wrote: » I'm honestly surprised anybody thinks that's all he was.
beno619 wrote: » He was an extremely underwhelming PFA player of the year compared to his predecessors, there were very few "**** me Hazard" moments last season.
Comic Book Guy wrote: » How badly was Shaw's absence felt last night. Martial was consistently double if not triple marked out on the left in the first half with Rojo never once going past him and in fact consistently being 20 yards behind him. Maybe orders from manager to curb Fernandes breaking? at least Valencia provided this option on other side and allowed lingard a bit of space. This thing about Rooney being starved of service is way over blown. Surely the main issue is his almost total lack of movement off the ball. No runs in behind or down the channels to at least try and pull the defence out of shape.
Gowlasauras Rex wrote: » If he was playing for utd you wouldn't think that. At least we can dismiss some of your opinion of hazard based on what team he plays for.
beno619 wrote: » Very true, I think he's a bit of a **** in general so its a tainted opinion.
TheDoc wrote: » I somewhat agree with Beno here. I found the superlatives for Hazard last year to be a bit over the top. He had an excellent season of which there is no doubt. But I felt it was magnified by Chelsea retreating into their shell second half of the season, and with him as the only creative spark for months, it further exaggerated his impact. But the impact he had there was no doubt. He was by far the best player last season, but that needs to be put in context. As Beno rightly points out, the top 4 in general were extremely poor in mounting title challenges and he just walked it. I didn't find much differences between Sanchez and Hazard for example, but obviously one winning the title, in cruise fashion, seemed to enhance his reputation further. Hazard was being compared last year to up there with Ronaldo and Messi, and one of the best players in the world. I think that was totally out of proportion. He was the main driving force of creativity in a title winning side. A side that crashed out of the CL to PSG in relatively spectacular fashion. As pointed out above, Bale provided the same return for Madrid yet was largely castrated for having a poor season(he didn't btw). Memphis was an absolute monster for PSV last season, probably (I havn't checked the figures) providing more direct input for PSv then Hazard did for Chelsea, but people weren't losing the run of themselves with him labelling him up there with Messi and Ronaldo. It's all a bit of perspective, but seeing Hazard this season, hearing how his manager talk about him, very much just compounds my view the reactions and superlatives provided to him last season were excessive and unrepresenting of the league as a whole, and where the player currently sits in terms of stature. A quality player of which there is no doubt, currently in a bit of a rough patch. But I feel he has a ways to go before being labelled "world class" or anything of the sort. But then thats just my take, and my views on what constitutes world class might differ to others.
bangkok wrote: » the best players in the world play in spain. There is no doubt about this. Pundits in the league know this but try and big up players like Hazard as being up there with Messi and Ronaldo, he isn't, but he is still a class player. Most would agree I imagine that the top 5 players in the world all play in spain Ronaldo Messi Neymar Suarez Bale
IamtheWalrus wrote: » Would the Spanish media include Bale in that list? I sometimes wonder if the British media include him as one of their own. Not knocking him by the way, just always wondered.
Pro. F wrote: » I'd have Hazard, Sanchez and Aguero up there with Neymar, Suarez and Bale. Messi and Ronaldo then are off on their own.
P4DDY2K11 wrote: » Does nobody rate the might Zlatan around here?
Pro. F wrote: » Who was labelling Hazard as up there with Messi and Ronaldo?
Vic Vinegar wrote: » That's pretty awful.
duffman13 wrote: » That came from Mourinho although this week he seems to be rolling back on those comments.http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/9926980/eden-hazard-better-than-ronaldo-says-chelsea-boss-jose-mourinho
duffman13 wrote: » It's generally accepted last year was a poor league in terms of quality. Hazard got the awards for the best player and rightly so. I do not however see him getting in to the Madrid or Barca team. Still after his antics when he originally signed for Chelsea and if the current situation is true that he is throwing his toys out of the pram, I wouldn't want him. He is a very good player.
bangkok wrote: » Aguero maybe yes and Sanchez is such a class player but was sold by Barcelona and before the game v United 2 weeks ago has never really done anything of note in many big games in the same way Neymar or Bale have. Hazard still has a lot to prove, he needs to be more consistent to be considered against the likes of Suarez bale etc
bangkok wrote: » Neymar will imo be the next player to win the Ballon Dor after Ronaldo/Messi. Only 23, 39 goals last season for Barcelona and already 46 goals for Brazil.
zerks wrote: »