TiltedBrain wrote: » He had a fit? But that might make the op less sensational
amdublin wrote: » Travelling partners of people who have fits don't tend to get arrested. I really don't think the op is over sensationalised.
Menas wrote: » Good to see that the garda were thorough here, searching the bags in the hold etc...
Ghost Train wrote: » Sounds like a bit of strange story, man had to be restrained after biting somebodyhttp://www.rte.ie/news/2015/1019/735776-aer-lingus-death/
Stranger Danger wrote: » Headline writers will have a field day with this story I fear. Fright for White Knight who get Bite in Drugs Blight Flight
donkeyoaty0099 wrote: » I think the person who was bitten was trying to help the guy who was having the seizure. He was probably trying to stop him from swallowing his tongue and the seizure caused his jaw to lock shut. I don't think it was zombie apocalypse style feeding on the flesh of the living stuff.
CFlat wrote: » People don't swallow their tongue having a fit. It's one of those urban myth type things. In fact the last thing you do is put your hand near their mouth cause they certainly can bite down and cause damage. So I was told on an Occ First Aid Course I did recently. You just give them space, on a flat surface if you can, and let the fit take its course.
CFlat wrote: » You just give them space, on a flat surface if you can, and let the fit take its course.
5starpool wrote: » I feel sorry for the person (presumably innocent) who was bitten. As for the dead person and his partner, if it was in the name of drugs then they got what they deserved.
sashafierce wrote: » Out of curiousity where does responsibility lie with regards this substance getting through security?
5starpool wrote: » As for the dead person and his partner, if it was in the name of drugs then they got what they deserved.
colm_mcm wrote: » Maybe the deceased mans relatives can sue security for not intercepting the substances! (not that there's any confirmation that there were drugs involved)
BattleCorp wrote: » Are you for real??? :eek: Seriously, have a think about that for a minute.
colm_mcm wrote: » Maybe a rolleyes would have been in order back there here :rolleyes: