The Corinthian wrote: » True, but apparently that's not the reason he gave for the move.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » Yes, he was having a dig. Whatever about the reasons, I don't know what he expected the government to do about Wi-Fi and hotel prices.
Carlo Ancelotti wrote: » Stilk doesnt look good trying to host a web event with ****ty broadband at the location
VinLieger wrote: » Which was his choice, he was given wifi package options and went for the cheapest one
Zeke Victorious Sparrow wrote: » This little trumped up *-$# wanted everybody to jump to his tune, pay for all the facilities HE wanted, discommode everybody else in the city, bring political pressure on issues that the government should not be involved with...all so he can cream profits in excess of 600k. We may be green but we are not that stupid. Let's see how happy he is after a spell in Portugal.
Sheeps wrote: » That's incorrect. The cheapest option was BT which was free because they wanted to advertise at the summit, and was not allowed by the RDS because they wanted to sell him the infrastructure they had in place. They were left with no option other than the built in infrastructure which was not up to standard. You have your facts wrong.
BattleReady wrote: » Not sure if this has been mentioned but I noticed sponsored ads from them on facebook asking people to read the emails between them and government. Seems pretty desperate. They were also getting lacerated on the comments section on an article on tech.eu. some guy just spamming responses in support of them. Looked pretty desperate also.
PARlance wrote: » but they were also here for the craic and the p*ss ups... that won't be the same elsewhere
Tarzana2 wrote: » Yes, Ireland is the only country in the world where craic happens. :pac:
kidneyfan wrote: » Most recreational drugs are legal in Portugal, the weather is great, the surfing is nearly as good and Lisbon in amazing.
PARlance wrote: » We just do it better than most.
grundie wrote: The RDS has fantastic WiFI infrastructure, with the ability to offer up to 10Ghz of bandwidth. When you book the venue you get a basic level of WiFi if you want more you have to pay.
markpb wrote: » 10Ghz of bandwidth? :-)
Tarzana2 wrote: » Well, if what you want is loads of drinking then maybe. And even then, I wouldn't be convinced.
PARlance wrote: » I'm going to predict that by Yr 3 it will be a shadow of the event it is now. Many of the attendees were here on jollies from bigger companies, they were over here for a fairly new and exciting event (that may lack substance), but they were also here for the craic and the p*ss ups... that won't be the same elsewhere, and when the novelty runs out it'll crash fairly quickly.
Bambi wrote: » Sheepy, sheepy , sheepy Speaking of facts, do you know who provided the WiFi infrastructure at the event? Do you know what design decision was imposed on them by the websummit which was convienantly forgotten by paddy when he was lambasting all and sundry? I mean you sound like you have the facts
Wompa1 wrote: » The Web Summit doesn't seem to be a very technical conference. It doesn't seem like something one would go to learn. To me as an outsider who has never been to it, just looking at the list of the speakers and topics. It came across as a circle jerk. Something like that will have limited appeal. Easily replaced by the next flavor of the month.
garrixfan wrote: » Its ****, Irish people are boring as ****