mayo.mick wrote: » Don't believe a word from that "journo". Been know for writing "suspect articles"
padd b1975 wrote: » The rumours have been doing the rounds on this very thread for a couple of weeks now. There was no way something like this was ever going to be kept under the radar. It would be naive for anyone to think otherwise. As for where the leaks came from.... as far as I'm concerned it could have come from any of the three parties involved, although realistically, you would have to think it came from the players.
BENDYBINN wrote: » If the system was so wrong how come we were 4 points up with 15 mins to go against the dubs?
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » What journo? There is no by line
seligehgit wrote: » TBF the vast majority of people totally understand where the players are coming from and identify with the very high standards they have come to expect in terms of their preparation.....But on a poorly human level one can have a great deal of sympathy for Noel Connelly and Pat Holmes.Nobody comes out a winner from this sorry saga,at least not in the short term.
davegrohl48 wrote: » I'v never understood the anti MacHale thing. He has a good knowledge of club football in Mayo and a good knowledge of modern tactics. Being from a basketball background the philosophy of training and preparation in basketball is superior to the traditional training methods of most GAA people. Basketball is all about skill development through repetition of perfect technique practice. Absolutely what modern teams need. Then you have defensive side of it with man to man and zonal and all this stuff that is way above my knowledge but Dublin used it this year. By contrast there are several older Mayo players who did much less when playing at club/county and at management level who are still seen as being legends of the game. Always this negative attitude to Liam MacHale. He might go on a bit about 1996, at the same time that is usually foisted upon him by some tv/radio or newspaper interview. Liam MacHale was weight training from 1985 onwards he was not actually blessed with natural bulk and strength in his early days, he developed it through dedicated hard work. Just an idea of how he's not just some naturally talented athlete who had it come easy so now he doesn't understand how to contribute on management side to the modern game. Liam could even name his first intro to that side of things by Liam ONeill.
Peist2007 wrote: » I was involved with McHale for a couple of teams over a couple of years. The allegations of being a spoofer are harsh but correct. McHale doesnt live in the current world of defensive systems etc. Andy Moran, Alan Dillon, etc would definitely agree on this too. Hence last year's supposed veto.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Just a couple of observations. If they are pining for Horans return I'd be surprised if Parsons is one of them. He had a fantastic year, but was ignored by Horan throughout his tenure. Lee Keegan not being on board is interesting and certainly a cause for concern for those who are driving this, he is a senior player and one of the best on the team. It would be interesting to see who the others are. Holmes and Connelly have every right to be pissed. They lead this team to a SF replay v the best team in the country in their first attempt. They certainly improved the team with the return of Parsons, the selection of DOC (although it could be argued that his inclusion was inevitable), and arguably with the move of AOS to FF. There were plenty of positives to take out of 2015 and work on all winter.
davegrohl48 wrote: » In fairness though apart from Stephen Rochford name me one high profile player or manager in Mayo with much credit in the bank over modern defensive systems? Playing wise Barry Moran is the only player I'v seen mark space intelligently for 70 mins and not rush in messing up the alignment of who is covering space towards goal.
Peist2007 wrote: » What's your point? The question was asked why McHale isnt wanted and you've just been told why by someone who played under him in various teams from a low to a very high level. If you still think McHale is the man then fine. He isnt though and Mayo have dodged a bullet if he is gone to Roscommon
keith16 wrote: » Neary sounds like an absolute Dinosaur in that interview and is someone who should have no place in the modern game. Looking at Mayo this year, it is painfully obvious that they have gone backwards in terms of match day tactics.
davegrohl48 wrote: » I believe Stephen Rochford is the best candidate just on that point. My point is that people dismiss Liam MacHale as not being knowledgable of the modern game. That may be true or not. It would be logical his knowledge has increased since he trained yourself. Coaches don't stand still knowledge wise no more than players. If he lacks defensive knowledge it's no worse than any other high profile manager we have had. I don't see why it's a thing to hold against Liam when James Horans teams were as leaky as a sieve. Even Horan stated in 2015 that he thinks sweeper system means you don't impose your game on the opposition. Well personally I like the idea of imposing the non-concession of goals on the opposition. You may be right and MacHale just doesn't have it. Specifically I can't see how his knowledge on defensive side has him way below other coaching candidates. Donie Buckley gets lauded to the high heavens as a coach. People gathering in hushed groups ... tackling, tackling, tackling. Quick review. - His teams have conceded goals - His coached defenders play individual not collective with lots of rushing in by players unnecessarily leaving space in behind. Many examples across league and championship.
Peist2007 wrote: » Donie Buckley is a coach. As is McHale. Goals being continuously leaked is at the manager's door. However, in order to be as effective as Mayo are ie tackling in swarms, high intensity teamwork, you need to be coached to do this. Based on what i have seen of McHale (and McStay as a manager) there is little emphasis on tactical aspects and more an emphasis on basic skills like handling etc which is honed doing more intense versions of drills you would do on your club pitch back home. That is not even nearly what a county team needs in 2015/2016. And i never said McHale shouldnt get the job because his teams would leak goals. That is a problem we have already. McHale would have us playing football from circa 2000. Would be nice to see a team line out traditionally i guess. Dont expect us to win though.
Shurimgreat wrote: » The current management have us playing football circa 2000...big man up front, bomb it in. Their attempt at a sweeper was poor, although I don't agree that modern sweepers tend to just stand on front of the goalie as Joe Brolly suggests.Lets be honest, a McStay/McHale combination would be streets ahead of the current setup and probably ahead of the Horan setup too. Provided they would retain Buckley. McHale could have been a selector. There's been some laughable stuff thrown around when it comes to choosing a Mayo manager. Objections to people who have no previous intercounty experience, objections to McHale on spurious grounds, objections to everyone and anyone. Whoever you choose is not going to be perfect. There is no perfect manager out there.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » That's a big leap to suggest that. Can you give us some idea of how you come to that conclusion. And if I recall Buckley was never part of the McStay package last year, that was given as one reason for them not being chosen.
davegrohl48 wrote: » When the players were told meetup again Wednesday after drawn game. Think on that as a club player or ex club player. Ridiculous.
naughto wrote: » It should have being the next evening g and every evening that week if need be
Ascii wrote: » Just a thought...If Keegan voted for H+C and is it fair to say that Big Bird Barry, Cunniffe, Kirby and Durcan voted for their old manager that we possibly have 5 of the 7 identified already ? On another note don't think this forum would be as busy if mayo won sam Maguire :-) My phone is smoking from the alerts
Shurimgreat wrote: » Not altogether sure what McStay had in mind for Buckley, but he should have been kept on. That said, McStay won an AI with McHale by his side and he clearly rates McHale as a coach. It makes no sense for McStay to undermine Mayo and his own chances by picking a bad coach. I'd trust McStay's judgement on this, more so than others. He's a proven manager, unlike many who comment about him. Harsh but true. As for him being streets ahead, all it takes is a bit of cop on to manage this group of Mayo players and sadly that's been lacking in recent years. Tactical nous is what is missing at key times.
Shurimgreat wrote: » The current management have us playing football circa 2000...big man up front, bomb it in. Their attempt at a sweeper was poor, although I don't agree that modern sweepers tend to just stand on front of the goalie as Joe Brolly suggests. Lets be honest, a McStay/McHale combination would be streets ahead of the current setup and probably ahead of the Horan setup too. Provided they would retain Buckley. McHale could have been a selector. There's been some laughable stuff thrown around when it comes to choosing a Mayo manager. Objections to people who have no previous intercounty experience, objections to McHale on spurious grounds, objections to everyone and anyone. Whoever you choose is not going to be perfect. There is no perfect manager out there. Another point, I noticed in recent years that Mayo teams are experts at swarm tackles, turning over, etc....but often p*ss poor at essential skills like kick passing and point scoring from play, particularly a number of forwards. You can only get so far with modern football. You need a bit of traditional football too, and Dublin and Kerry both have footballers who can mix the modern with traditional skills.
paintitwhite wrote: » Isn't there a family connection between McStay and McHale? I would rate that ticket highly but worth pointing out as its a stick being used to beat the current ticket.