nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Laws Question? Ask here!

Alan_007_

Just wondering.If the ball is on the ground and you kick it over do you get the 3 points or is it play on?

Find more posts tagged with

rugby

conversion

charge

kick

chargedown

Quick Links

Comments

Yeah_Right

My issue with the refereeing this tournament has been George Ayoub. It seems like every time he is the TMO, he has to get involved and look at every cell phone in the crowd to see if something happened.

rrpc

connemara man wrote: »

I think its more of a consistency issue to be fair

Is that consistency between refs or consistency of a particular ref in a particular game?

The former is always true each ref has his own interpretation of how a game should be played. The latter is not as acceptable (genuine mistakes aside).

The Lost Sheep

connemara man wrote: »

I think its more of a consistency issue to be fair

Ah right...

sydthebeat wrote: »

Nah. Nothing major.

The refeering in the tournament so far has been very good, apart from one or two less than convincing (joubert and peyper). I have been impressed by our Irish guys Clancy and lacey (and doyle who I'll claim as well) but my ref of the tournament so far has been barnes who had been excellent in both decision making and communication. He's up there with owens currently.

From what ive seen it has been good. Havent had too many issues

sydthebeat

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

Didnt see much rugby today. Scanning through threads seemed to be a few complaints about different refereeing decisions from today
Any issues to bring up here???

Nah. Nothing major.

The refeering in the tournament so far has been very good, apart from one or two less than convincing (joubert and peyper). I have been impressed by our Irish guys Clancy and lacey (and doyle who I'll claim as well) but my ref of the tournament so far has been barnes who had been excellent in both decision making and communication. He's up there with owens currently.

[Deleted User]

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

Didnt see much rugby today. Scanning through threads seemed to be a few complaints about different refereeing decisions from today
Any issues to bring up here???

I think its more of a consistency issue to be fair

The Lost Sheep

Didnt see much rugby today. Scanning through threads seemed to be a few complaints about different refereeing decisions from today
Any issues to bring up here???

The Lost Sheep

Nigel Owens explaining the different signals a referee will use in the game.
Havent heard the audio as he explains each but should be pretty good for people unsure of what exactly a referee is signalling
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/r...arebar_twitter

sydthebeat

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

What do people make of this law clarification around an opponent kicking the ball out of the hands of a player who has picked up the ball.
http://www.arlb.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/150911-CL-Law-Clarification-7-2015.pdf

i agree with this

We do not consider that this action is either:
(i) A fair contest for the ball.
or
(ii) Can be considered a legal means of dis-possessing a player.

sydthebeat

crc wrote: »

So, I come at this as someone who (briefly) played out-half at school. Say the 10 kicks for the corner and it lands within 1 metre of the touch line, bounces, and then goes into touch. In my view the 10 has executed a perfect kick. Too long and it goes out on the full; too short and it stays in play. I think that if the defender is going to interfere with this kick he either has to keep the ball in play and run with it, or concede the line-out. I suppose you could say that the kicker shouldn't have kicked it so close to a defending player, and there's some merit to that, but I really enjoy an inch perfect kick that lands just inside touch and bounces out.

anything that makes the 10's life a bit harder is ok in my book.

a good wing or FB can cover the area where a 10 might land a full strength kick , thus the 10 either has to kick in field, or kick for less yardage.

if the wing or FB is already in that position to catch, the 10 shouldnt target him.

its good defending that rewarded, not a punishment on the 10.
in your video example its bad kick thats offered. theres no reason the kick couldnt have been targeted to land outside the 5m and still be contestable.

accidentprone1

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

I really don't see any issue with having one foot in and one out to catch a kick if done right. Defender isn't interfering with the kick. The kicker wont always have kicked close to a defender as often defender will move into position from afar to give lineout

What do people make of this law clarification around an opponent kicking the ball out of the hands of a player who has picked up the ball.
http://www.arlb.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/150911-CL-Law-Clarification-7-2015.pdf

I think it's a perfectly sensible clarification. The potential for injury is there, and massive damage could be done to a hand if someone actually lashed out with proper force.

The Lost Sheep

crc wrote: »

So, I come at this as someone who (briefly) played out-half at school. Say the 10 kicks for the corner and it lands within 1 metre of the touch line, bounces, and then goes into touch. In my view the 10 has executed a perfect kick. Too long and it goes out on the full; too short and it stays in play. I think that if the defender is going to interfere with this kick he either has to keep the ball in play and run with it, or concede the line-out. I suppose you could say that the kicker shouldn't have kicked it so close to a defending player, and there's some merit to that, but I really enjoy an inch perfect kick that lands just inside touch and bounces out.

I really don't see any issue with having one foot in and one out to catch a kick if done right. Defender isn't interfering with the kick. The kicker wont always have kicked close to a defender as often defender will move into position from afar to give lineout

What do people make of this law clarification around an opponent kicking the ball out of the hands of a player who has picked up the ball.
http://www.arlb.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/150911-CL-Law-Clarification-7-2015.pdf

pickarooney

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

They are more clarifications than changes... I didn't have any issue with defenders catching kicks by having one foot out. What was your issue with this?
On b. That wasn't always the case and existing rule and if deemed over plane of touch. An AR/TJ could flag for ball being in touch and game would restart with Lineout

He has competed for ball and in majority of cases will have aided ball carrier to go to ground. Majority of refs/cases will call him tackler assist and then player 2 must release.

By wrap player up you mean???

Wrapping his arms around the player to tackle. There can be two consequences - either the player is accompanied to the ground and it's a tackle or the defender holds him up and it's a contest for the ball, generally resulting in a rip, maul or unplayable ball situation.

Again, I'm assuming no wrap and just two players grappling on the ball, so no tackle and the player voluntarily going to ground will have to let go or be penalised.

Maybe we need a diagram from the question's poster.

crc

sydthebeat wrote: »

If the ball bounces in play it's in play?
Where is the question?

See the kick at 0:35 for an example of what I mean; the catch is at 0:38.
https://youtu.be/k53uEY2eiQY?t=27s

sydthebeat

If the ball bounces in play it's in play?
Where is the question?

crc

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

I didn't have any issue with defenders catching kicks by having one foot out. What was your issue with this?

So, I come at this as someone who (briefly) played out-half at school. Say the 10 kicks for the corner and it lands within 1 metre of the touch line, bounces, and then goes into touch. In my view the 10 has executed a perfect kick. Too long and it goes out on the full; too short and it stays in play. I think that if the defender is going to interfere with this kick he either has to keep the ball in play and run with it, or concede the line-out. I suppose you could say that the kicker shouldn't have kicked it so close to a defending player, and there's some merit to that, but I really enjoy an inch perfect kick that lands just inside touch and bounces out.

The Lost Sheep

crc wrote: »

I like the change 19d (Touch): "Change the law so that a player who is in touch who catches or picks up a ball that has not reached the plane of touch is deemed to have taken the ball into touch."
I never liked the ability for a defender to cause an otherwise perfect kick to the corner to be ruled as going out on the full just by having one foot over the touchline.

I also like 19b "Permit a player to jump from the playing area and return a ball to play that has reached the plane of touch provided the player does so before he or she lands in touch."
...but to be honest I thought that this was the existing ruling.

They are more clarifications than changes... I didn't have any issue with defenders catching kicks by having one foot out. What was your issue with this?
On b. That wasn't always the case and existing rule and if deemed over plane of touch. An AR/TJ could flag for ball being in touch and game would restart with Lineout

pickarooney wrote: »

As I understand the question player 2 has not tackled player 1 but just latched on to the ball. Player 1 has gone off his feet and so must release the ball. Player two can simply play on.

He has competed for ball and in majority of cases will have aided ball carrier to go to ground. Majority of refs/cases will call him tackler assist and then player 2 must release.

pickarooney wrote: »

Just because player 1 chooses to go into contact doesn't automatically make player 2 a tackler. If he doesn't wrap the player up and just tries to rip the ball then he's fine, IMO.

By wrap player up you mean???

pickarooney

Release what?
The ball? For what reason?
The player? He's not holding him...

sydthebeat

pickarooney wrote: »

Just because player 1 chooses to go into contact doesn't automatically make player 2 a tackler. If he doesn't wrap the player up and just tries to rip the ball then he's fine, IMO.

If player 2 stops the progress of player 1 by targeting the ball, he's still a tackler and must release when 1 goes to ground. What your describing is typical 'tackle assist' play and this player must still release.

irishbucsfan

pickarooney wrote: »

Just because player 1 chooses to go into contact doesn't automatically make player 2 a tackler. If he doesn't wrap the player up and just tries to rip the ball then he's fine, IMO.

I don't know the exact letter of the law but even if you can find a way to contest the ball without holding a part of the ball carrier (even wrapping your arms through theirs) then I'd be very surprised. In reality in that situation you will have brought the ball carrier to ground and you'll be a tackler. It would be impossible for referees to distinguish anyway, they'll enforce the release.

Either way it's not only a tackler who was to release. Assistant tackler rules cover anyone in contact with the ball carrier who also have to release, and that's been enforced properly and consistently since the ELVs.

pickarooney

Just because player 1 chooses to go into contact doesn't automatically make player 2 a tackler. If he doesn't wrap the player up and just tries to rip the ball then he's fine, IMO.

irishbucsfan

Player 2 has to clearly release. Player 1 is the tackled player and player 2 is the tackler. Player 1 took the ball into contact according to the question.

pickarooney

sydthebeat wrote: »

the tackle is complete once player 1 gets to ground, therefore player 2 must release before fighting for the ball

As I understand the question player 2 has not tackled player 1 but just latched on to the ball. Player 1 has gone off his feet and so must release the ball. Player two can simply play on.

crc

The Lost Sheep wrote: »

World Rugby today announced the proposed changes to laws that will be looked at over the next few seasons. Any thoughts?

http://pulse-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/test/worldrugby/document/2015/09/05/0b9c59b0-bd64-449d-94be-6d6ef938f7f2/150906_Law_Trials.pdf

I like the change 19d (Touch): "Change the law so that a player who is in touch who catches or picks up a ball that has not reached the plane of touch is deemed to have taken the ball into touch."
I never liked the ability for a defender to cause an otherwise perfect kick to the corner to be ruled as going out on the full just by having one foot over the touchline.

I also like 19b "Permit a player to jump from the playing area and return a ball to play that has reached the plane of touch provided the player does so before he or she lands in touch."
...but to be honest I thought that this was the existing ruling.

sydthebeat

shaungil wrote: »

Player 1 brings the ball into contact and player 2 tackles on the ball, just 2 players involved. Player 1 fights to try and get the ball to deck and his body to the ground. Player 2 stys on his feet and stays attached to the ball leaning over player 1. Is player 2 entitled to fight for bal or must he release allowing player1 to place the ball back?

the tackle is complete once player 1 gets to ground, therefore player 2 must release before fighting for the ball

The Lost Sheep

shaungil wrote: »

Player 1 brings the ball into contact and player 2 tackles on the ball, just 2 players involved. Player 1 fights to try and get the ball to deck and his body to the ground. Player 2 stys on his feet and stays attached to the ball leaning over player 1. Is player 2 entitled to fight for bal or must he release allowing player1 to place the ball back?

Player two must release to compete for the ball.

awec

Tackler has to release before competing for the ball.

A lot of the time rather than just letting to you'll see players throw their arms over their head really quickly to make it really obvious to the referee that they've released.

shaungil

Player 1 brings the ball into contact and player 2 tackles on the ball, just 2 players involved. Player 1 fights to try and get the ball to deck and his body to the ground. Player 2 stys on his feet and stays attached to the ball leaning over player 1. Is player 2 entitled to fight for bal or must he release allowing player1 to place the ball back?

phog

I hadn't scrolled down far enough to see the law changes for Law 22

Good idea to allow the defending team who would previously have been awarded a 5m scrum to restart the game can now oot for a 5m drop out.

I think that has the potential to speed up the game.

phog

pickarooney wrote: »

The Welsh premiership is trialling 6 point tries, two point penalties and 8 point penalty tries this season I read.

Not sure if that eight points includes an automatic conversion or if it's just to dissuade defenders giving away cheap penalties.

I think it's an automatic conversion.

The Lost Sheep

pickarooney wrote: »

The Welsh premiership is trialling 6 point tries, two point penalties and 8 point penalty tries this season I read.

Not sure if that eight points includes an automatic conversion or if it's just to dissuade defenders giving away cheap penalties.

The 8 points includes an automatic conversion...
Many of these trials are being looked at in Wales this season