Stereomaniac wrote: » I'm all for sticking up for the ones I care about. But only if they need me to do that. Some of the people I know are likely to just allow themselves be walked on. But this chiming in crap....
Ageyev wrote: » Not sure what you're referencing here but a friend recently made a similar point to me about people voicing disagreement on behalf of others. It really depends on what was said and in what context tbh.
Stereomaniac wrote: » Woah, I got a fright for a second there and thought you were serious. I don't get jokes sometimes!
sky88 wrote: » Hey guys so I'm going to an afters of a wedding and have literally no idea what to do wear. I was thinking of just wearing a suit cause I don't want to go underdressed Can any of u help cause I'm useless with fashion
Mick Murdock wrote: » Usually a shirt, tie and suit pants would suffice. Depending on the weather of course. It's really one of those meaningless things that people worry about.. Nobody will care what you wear but if you have suitable clothing already you will be fine. I wouldn't be buying anything of consequence.
ERG89 wrote: » Yeah its the afters. Suit for wedding alright but not the afters. Skip the tie unless you want a drunken woman to grab it to rock out to AC/DC..... Just me?
Pentecost wrote: » Shirt, tie, pants is grand for an afters. You can take the tie off when the dancing starts in earnest.
Ageyev wrote: » When did we start saying "pants" :pac:
Pentecost wrote: » Never thought about it until now but pants always springs to mind for more formal attire.
Diabhal Beag wrote: » This is like the "mam v mum v mom" debate where everybody is equally wrong.