Tired_Man wrote: » Hi there, I was just wondering if anybody had a list of the topics which came up on the Equity paper in March? It's my last exam now. In a fit of what I now realise to be arrogance coupled with relief I ripped up the paper and threw it in the bin afterwards and got 47! It seems pretty funny now. Just for anyone doing their first set or lacking motivation for repeats (I have been there) a really important part of passing them especially in the final month leading up to them is to just keep grinding away for as many hours as possible and it'll be fine.
Billetdoux wrote: » Does anyone have any thoughts on the Injunctions question in Equity this time round? I know she focused on Mareva specifically at the last sitting... Perhaps Anton Piller for this sitting? I know I should know both etc but time is now limited and I have to start committing to memory!
kd2121 wrote: » Anyone have a list of topics their covering for EU??
kd2121 wrote: » Ive only just started, hope I have enough time to get through everything. Thinking of Institutions, Sources, Fundemental Rights, Direct Effect and Supremacy, Judicial Review, Preliminary Reference Procedure, FMG, Citizenship and Competition. Don't know if I'll get through all that at this stage
Alma Tight Nitty-gritty wrote: » This is slightly off topic but does anyone else get annoyed studying EU law? I know I should probably switch off my analytical side of the brain and just cram it all in, but looking at the ECJ case law just gets me thinking. Most decisions seem to go in favour of the EU. Legal doctrines and remedies (direct effect being a prime example) seem to be created from thin air. Then compare the threshold to get interim relief when challenging an EU measure (Martini case) with challenging a national measure for compliance with EU law (Factorame No 2). Sometime it just seems the law is whatever suits the EU.
Legalseagull wrote: » Hi folks - quick question about Company Law (apologies if its already been dealt with). Are people striking out Ultra Vires as a topic? It's essentially void now under CA 2014, unless it were to come up in a DAC question. I don't think he could ask a DAC question though, as that's specific to 2014 and you don't have to have covered 2014...thoughts? Also, the permitted sources don't seem to allow you to bring in the 2014 Act - bit annoying! Thanks!
larryloffy wrote: » Would anyone have EU sample answers they wouldn't mind sending me?? I'm struggling. Looked up the one day revision course and it's 150 euro for the day! I have loads of Equity notes/lectures I can share. Also, where could I get my hands on the EU articles/legislation to bring into the exam? Thanks, Laura
FE1 EXAMS 2013 wrote: » Would anybody know what art came up in March 15 for free movement of goods? I think it is art 34 but I can't tell even with the book in front of me! Can anybody shed some light on this please!? Thinking of scrapping art 34 if it was asked and focusing on art 110 and 30
kiwi33 wrote: » OK reassurace needed badly here! I'm up to date on all my griffith college lectures now on contract, property and equity.. only really getting down to the nitty gritty now... Do I have enough time.. First time doing them and lacking in experience!
Tired_Man wrote: » I would say for those three subjects you definitely have enough time to actually learn everything necessary to pass five questions from now until the exams, provided you're actually learning as opposed to watching lectures and writing notes.
