JustTheOne wrote: » Or Angela Merkel.
handlemaster wrote: » Waiting for the "bankers" comment
KC161 wrote: » I wonder will people want to #talktojoan now
seamus wrote: » That was in effect Murphy's go-to argument this morning. "Around the corner were two families who were living in their cars because of Joan Burton. Yet she was concerned about spending a couple of hours in hers". He's just a complete cock. He doesn't even understand the charges against him.
The Muppet wrote: » How were the protestors to know she was on her way to the Dail? It'll be quite a simple defence i'd imagine if it ever gets to court, I doubt it will.
RomanKnows wrote: » I would love if Paul 'The Revolution will be tweeted about' Murphy wasn't one of those charged.
Bracken81 wrote: » "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." JFK Great to see some Irish people stand up for what they believe in Of course I'm sure they're all Jobless/Dole scrounging scumbags, or at least that what the Upper & Middle classes want you to believe :-)
Specialun wrote: » I tend to not give a flying about these but i do find it odd that theyre being charged. Farmers have blocked in factories and other protests have blocked in groups and nobody was ever charged. In my opinion the boys in the free bar brigade in the dail are using scare tactics in the hope to make people think twice about protesting in the future
paulbok wrote: » She was a TD, stands to reason there was a good chance she would be going to the Dáil.
black and amber wrote: » Apt username.
awec wrote: » Farmers have not acted like these thugs did during their own protests. There is no comparison to be made.
100gSoma wrote: » Couldn't agree more. Fair play to them taking time away from their jobs at great personal financial loss to highlight this important issue. Bravo. Pity more people couldn't make the sacrifice. Right?
The Muppet wrote: » A good chance would hardly be conclusive proof it in a court of law, would it?
OldGoat wrote: » It's not a point that requires proof. It's doesn't matter where she was going, it doesn't matter that she is a TD.
The Muppet wrote: » Good so the next time anyone involved in a protest delays another citizen moving about the area they can be charged with false imprisonment. The government/gardai or whoever is responsible for this farcical situation have lost the plot big time. Roll on election time.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » if a mob surrounded you in your car and prevented you from moving for 2 hours would you be happy if the gardai did nothing?
The Muppet wrote: » Good so the next time anyone involved in a protest delays another citizen moving about the area they can be charged with false imprisonment.
The Muppet wrote: » Many different groups including farmers have had dublin in gridlock many times with people stuck in thier cars unable to get to their destination. , no one has ever been charge with false imprisonment over it.
The Muppet wrote: » I doubt very much if anyone would be charged with false imprisonment in that scenario.
15.—(1) A person shall be guilty of the offence of false imprisonment who intentionally or recklessly— (a) takes or detains, or (b) causes to be taken or detained, or (c) otherwise restricts the personal liberty of, another without that other's consent.
20Cent wrote: » Seems they haven't been charged yet, the story was "leaked" to the media in advance. Political policing at its best. Violence damage yeah of course but false imprisonment no way. Any protest outside the Dail could be deemed false imprisonment.
The Muppet wrote: » Are you sure?https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2512&dat=19670309&id=xwdIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=HAANAAAAIBAJ&pg=4416,1148380&hl=en Many different groups including farmers have had dublin in gridlock many times with people stuck in thier cars unable to get to their destination. , no one has ever been charge with false imprisonment over it.
syklops wrote: » If you think surrounding the car and banging on it is acceptable behaviour, then you sound like a muppet.
anncoates wrote: » Charging them with false imprisonment - and subsequently hoping Murphy will be stripped of his seat - will just be seen as clumsy political maneuvering and will backfire.
Jawgap wrote: » Even if he's found guilty, he won't be stripped of his seat.