endacl wrote: » What he did was not illegal. It was, however, ****. Most people, when confronted with **** behaviour, let the individual concerned know that what they did was ****, and that they themselves are more than likely, a ****. In the good old days, this may have been one or two people confronting the **** about his **** behaviour. Now it's one or two, times a million or so. Fair play to them all. ****.
kneemos wrote: » The Lion man(who did nothing illegal) has been attacked unmercifully.
kneemos wrote: » The right,sensible and long term solution then would be to campaign to change the law. Mobs don't like to use reason though do they?
Samaris wrote: » Having said all that, it is not yet decided whether or not he did do something illegal. It appears that the guides certainly did, it has yet to be decided whether Palmer knew it was.
kneemos wrote: » The right,sensible and long term solution then would be to campaign to change the law. ?[/QUOTE I'm a person who campaigned to help bring in the recent animal health and welfare act. The judge in the Liam Dowling case sent out a message that it doesn't really matter how you treat an animal regardless of how many laws are passed so yeah, this week I'm on the side of the angry internet mobs.
thegreatgonzo wrote: I'm a person who campaigned to help bring in the recent animal health and welfare act. The judge in the Liam Dowling case sent out a message that it doesn't really matter how you treat an animal regardless of how many laws are passed so yeah, this week I'm on the side of the angry internet mobs.
dxhound2005 wrote: » I am thankful that we have Mod rule here and a Prison to keep this place half civilised. There are some very strange people out there.
RedemptionZ wrote: » This didn't happen in Ireland. Campaign for harsher penalties if you feel so passionate about animals. Or just give up and say some mean things about the bad man that shot the lion. See which one helps the animals more.
thegreatgonzo wrote: » I'm talking about the case in DUBLIN which the OP referenced in their first post.
RedemptionZ wrote: » ...and this justifies going along with mob rule how? If you don't believe the penalties handed out are harsh enough, campaign for harsher ones! Being mean to one person on the Internet isn't going to do anything in the grand scheme of things.
kneemos wrote: » What can be done about these internet mobs who decide to start a campaign of abuse and destroy the lives of whoever happens to be in the news this week? The Lion man(who did nothing illegal) has been attacked unmercifully. Just the other day some on here were advocating starting a campaign against a particular Judge. Quite a few of the internet heroes who participate in these things I suspect have little understanding or real interest but are simply in it for the thrill and come next week will have completely forgotten their passionate crusade. Is there a solution to the modern equivalent of townsfolk with pitchforks?
Cold War Kid wrote: » I don't care about the dentist but this is affecting his kids - not cool.