Inspector Coptoor wrote: » In YOUR opinion. I disagree. I think cash is a very practical gift nowadays where coupes are already co-habitating and already have a toaster and a kettle
Starscream25 wrote: » I'm single, going to a wedding soon enough, I'm broke with about 300 yo to to my name, full time student, earn about 500 a month, can't find any other work, Worried about how much I should give as a gift, was thinking100 initially but after reading here i was thinking more in the line of €50. Is that too tight or should I be tightening my belt even more? Will be driving home after and not staying night in hotel, not a hope.
Inspector Coptoor wrote: » And more power to you. When it happens, I hope you have a great time. We tried to keep numbers down to under 150, in the end it peaked out at 230 odd for dinner with around 100 in for afters. Country weddings are a different kettle of fish
mayway wrote: » I always make sure that I go as it would be too disappointing for them if I my card didn't show up.
gimmick wrote: » I absolutely boards.ie when the subject wedding is mentioned. Peoples opinions of how they should work, how they should be arranged, saved for and attended is astounding. It is also very moral high groundy. Well MY wedding was so perfect we asked everyone to not give a gift. But MY wedding was so perfect no body minded giving a gift. But but, MY wedding no one read far too much into it and just went with it. Well I am so happy being terminally single and therefore have no real understanding of how relationships and wedding planning works that I feel compelled to spew MY opinion all over everyone. Afterall I am not shackled by a relationship to cloud MY judgement.
steddyeddy wrote: » From an etiquette point of view I would agree cash I tacky.
deathtocaptcha wrote: » You just didn't have the balls to cut people out. Assuming there's 5 in each family, all siblings have partners, 3 x bridesmaids and 3 x best men (again assuming all have partners), that equals a total of 26. Add in grandparents and perhaps aunts / uncles and the average Irish couple may end up with about 40 on average. That's all you need at a wedding.
Tony Beetroot wrote: » You would want to be giving €200 as a couple going to a wedding at a minimum, people who dont give any gift are tight arses.
freshpopcorn wrote: » You can say the same about attending a wedding. If you can't afford a reasonable gift. Stay at home.
Cienciano wrote: » That's a bizarre attitude. If I invited someone to my wedding and they didn't go because they didn't have the money for a gift, I'd be seriously disappointed.
dark crystal wrote: » As a couple we wouldn't have a hope of gifting someone €200, certainly not if we needed to eat or pay rent that week! We both have low enough paying jobs and five mouths to feed and anyone who invited us to their wedding would understand that and hopefully not expect us to shell out half a weeks wages to supplement their big day. Of course we'd give something, but €200 is taking the piss, especially with all the other expenses guests most likely incur on the day. What a rotten, money obsessed society we've become since the Celtic Tiger started roaring.
steddyeddy wrote: » Yea I think this is a Celtic tiger cub Thi g DK. I'd rather decent people like you and your partner at my wedding than some vulgar money obsessed over privileged people.
freshpopcorn wrote: » That's actually something I often wondered about weddings. I asked people about this before what were wedding gifts like 30+ years ago and they said people gave gifts but they were expensive gifts. That's you'd need starting off in life in your new family home. Now most people are living together so people feel they've everything they need so we'll just give cash. Expensive gifts at weddings were given at wedding long before the boom.
steddyeddy wrote: » Of course they were but before the boom people weren't as well off. There was a greater understanding that people might not have been in a position to bring gifts.
Electric Sheep wrote: » Since I am old enough to answer this question, people gave gifts, but the gifts ranged from inexpensive to expensive, depending on what the giver could afford, and what the recipient wanted/needed. It wasn't unusual for several friends to club together to get a "large" gift rather than individual cheaper gifts, as there is a limit to how many small appliances anyone needs. Sets of sheets and towels were also popular, you can never have too many of them. It was definitely in the intention of helping the couple get set up in their home, no "paying for your dinner" type of thing. Gifts were sent to the home of the mother of the bride before the wedding, where they would usually be put on display in the front room! There was none of this bringing the gift to the wedding crap, I don't know when that started but it makes no sense at all to me.
freshpopcorn wrote: » People still bought gifts tough expensive or in-expensive. People rarely showed up empty handed.
Electric Sheep wrote: » They always showed up empty handed as you did not bring gifts to the wedding. You gave the gifts before or after the wedding. Can you imagine having to haul home all the gifts otherwise?