nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Summer 2015 Transfer Window General Discussion

Lord TSC

So with one game to go in the Premier League, and all the major leagues wrapped up in terms of winners, figured it was time to throw open a general transfer discussion thread.

What's your team hoping for? Who are the targets? Who is staying put and who is going? What are your hopes for the next three months

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Utopia Parkway

Ordinary man wrote: »

Have liverpool already spent the sterling money on firimino and the others or is it extra to spend on top of that?

The most reliable journalists that cover Liverpool seem to think the spending done so far was not the Sterling money being spent in advance. Guess we''ll find out soon enough.

Fowler87

Ordinary man wrote: »

Have liverpool already spent the sterling money on firimino and the others or is it extra to spend on top of that?

Depends on the Ings tribunal but I make it net spend of around 10m when the Sterling deal is finalised

Oat23

CSF wrote: »

Someone had to make it a Liverpool United thing eventually. Congrats DenMan. You're now that guy.

I think when we wanted that LOI forum a few years ago we made a huge mistake. The campaign should have been to give United and Liverpool their own forum.

We would have had a lot more support and this forum would be much better.

Ordinary man

Have liverpool already spent the sterling money on firimino and the others or is it extra to spend on top of that?

Utopia Parkway

CSF wrote: »

Someone had to make it a Liverpool United thing eventually. Congrats DenMan. You're now that guy.

There's always one.

DenMan

CSF wrote: »

Someone had to make it a Liverpool United thing eventually. Congrats DenMan. You're now that guy.

It was bound to happen in fairness!

CSF

Someone had to make it a Liverpool United thing eventually. Congrats DenMan. You're now that guy.

razorblunt

Paully D wrote: »

Southampton rubbing their hands with glee as Rodgers prepares a £40m bid for Maya Yoshida.

Surely Ward-Prowse, two players for the price of one?

Or FSG will charge £10 for the hyphen, they'll have the money made back in no time.

DenMan

Just watched Phil Thompson being talked to on SSN. Man what a gob****e! This man still lives in the 80's and is so seriously blinkered it's unreal! He was asked "Are Liverpool now becoming a selling team?" and he responds talking about the new stadium and all the new fans Liverpool will have next year. 10,000 new fans in a revamped stand...WOW!!! Carragher was on yesterday dismissing Utd's deal for Schweinsteiger while Liverpool sign Milner to replace the legend Gerrard and then give Henderson the captaincy! They'll bring on Balotelli as a sub next season expecting him to turn things around and win games for them. Seriously deluded club they are!

Fowler87

Duke Disgusting Certificate wrote: »

Just saw a list on Facebook of people who cost less than Sterling, I'll list the big ones:
Aguero=£38m
Sanchez=£32m
Costa=£32m

Sterling=£49m.....

Its all relative to the crazy inflation within the league last few years though

CSF

Duke Disgusting Certificate wrote: »

Just saw a list on Facebook of people who cost less than Sterling, I'll list the big ones:
Aguero=£38m
Sanchez=£32m
Costa=£32m

Sterling=£49m.....

If I'm a City fan I'm happy enough here. They don't get players for anything like their value ever. Sterling for 49 million or Fernandinho for 30? 10 years from Sterling there and they won't be unhappy they paid it.

diusmr8a504cvk

Just saw a list on Facebook of people who cost less than Sterling, I'll list the big ones:
Aguero=£38m
Sanchez=£32m
Costa=£32m

Sterling=£49m.....

CSF

ScienceNerd wrote: »

His first game back at Anfield should be fun

Hated for life there. No question.

GLaDOS

His first game back at Anfield should be fun

Headshot

Just watch ssn there now transfer window is gone mad. It makes Bale look like value

diusmr8a504cvk

CSF wrote: »

Brendan Rodgers would have nothing to do with that kind of thing really. Liverpool have done well to get that much for a player who had completely isolated himself from the club though. No question about that.

Well and truly, he had to go. He had made himself such a terrible reputation over the course of a few weeks that he would never survive the deserved abuse he was in for.

CSF

Duke Disgusting Certificate wrote: »

Brendan Rodgers is a genius, wouldn't sell Sterling until he got "The Godfather Offer". The question now is whether or not he'll put that money to good use.

Brendan Rodgers would have nothing to do with that kind of thing really. Liverpool have done well to get that much for a player who had completely isolated himself from the club though. No question about that.

diusmr8a504cvk

Brendan Rodgers is a genius, wouldn't sell Sterling until he got "The Godfather Offer". The question now is whether or not he'll put that money to good use.

Paully D

I reckon Sterling will do very well at City.

slingerz

rwbug wrote: »

Liverpool won't be laughing. The price may seem ok but they are proving that they can't hold on to their top talents. The money they got from Saurez didn't exactly drive them forwards.

They'd be grand sure Raheem left his laughing gas at Melwood he was in such a rush out the door

Harry Palmr

rwbug wrote: »

So Liverpool get £36m now after QPR get their cut. Doesn't seem that great for them.

Liverpool bought him for £500,000 quid they pocket £36 million. Not bad.

CSF

rarnes1 wrote: »

Sterling cost about £15m more than Sanchez cost Arsenal :eek:

6 years age gap in the difference and homegrown status. It isn't a simple comparison of like for like who is better. City have now got a guy with all the potential in the world who they'll have for 10 years now.

Is he overpriced? Yes. But for a 20 year old English player with homegrown status and that high of a ceiling of potential, it was never going to be a situation where the player would go for anything like their value.

Sterling no more overpriced than Firmino was so I'd say Liverpool have broken about even in terms of inflations of value.

SantryRed

rwbug wrote: »

So Liverpool get £36m now after QPR get their cut. Doesn't seem that great for them.

Beats having a divisive figure in the dressing room for the next two years and getting nothing for him. He was adamant that he wanted to go. Liverpool have gotten a very good deal here.

rwbug

So Liverpool get £36m now after QPR get their cut. Doesn't seem that great for them.

Rayne Wooney

City are insane

[Deleted User]

City can afford to take the financial risk I guess

Utopia Parkway

So the question now is it going to be Benteke and AN Other or just Benteke? Would be disappointed if we just settle for Benteke by himself now.

MightyMandarin

Jaysus this puts things in even perspective. Good talent but a serious risk taken by City here.

https://twitter.com/MatthewStanger/status/620277995450814464

Turtyturd

rarnes1 wrote: »

Sterling cost about £15m more than Sanchez cost Arsenal :eek:

Barcelona also wanted rid of Sanchez to bring in an upgrade.

Paully D

Liamalone wrote: »

Sterling gone for 49m

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33497488

Southampton rubbing their hands with glee as Rodgers prepares a £40m bid for Maya Yoshida.