frazzledhome wrote: » I was going to ask that, did you get a crop off first? After a lot of huffing and puffing, when figures were put up the main players in the discussion disappeared. On the rate for borrowed, are you talking the margin you pay or total cost of funds? Some of the rates quoted earlier were very high IMO. I find the rate the easiest thing to negotiate when dealing with the bank. Guy are trying to repay too quickly I feel so not a real comparison. I'd be interested on your take
Greengrass1 wrote: » Was at a walk last summer in a farm going from winter milk to all spring. Good operator etc etc. any way his sinopsis was that most in ireland only sow it for a status symbols and it's always sown beside the road. Beet is a much more consistent crop and great feeding. A man speaking at moorepark on Wednesday who started in 2011 said he started grazing it for first time last autumn. fats of 6 and proteins of 5. that's when bills get paid was his comment. This man has no sheds 130 cows out wintered on kale and couldn't get a loan from banks when starting out because he had no 'experience'. Started on 20ha and has grown to 65ha today. These ladd are going to knock the socks off every existing farmer in yrs to come One final point of his. 'All the machinery i need is 20 Gallagher geared reels about 5000 pig tails and a plate meter and i can do anything'
frazzledhome wrote: » If this thread displays any thing its the fact that any dairy farmer who sows maize in Ireland needs their head tested.
mahoney_j wrote: » To play devils advocate he may also be put out of business by co co or dept inspections ..unreal the difference in inspectors in different areas .hope none of ye ever get some of the North tipp contingent
Dawggone wrote: » Excellent post Greengrass. That about sums up what grass based/low cost systems SHOULD be. Too much hardship for me though...
Greengrass1 wrote: » This man said it out right he loves hardship and he loves muck lol. He has a day job and gers up at 4 30 every morning. Just really loves cows. Had a 9% empty rate his first yr and is still giving out to himself over it
Greengrass1 wrote: » The question was asked and never got in trouble he has storage and as long as a ring feeder isn't left in the one spot all winter and cows are back fenced. He's on very very dry land in skibbereen
Greengrass1 wrote: » Ahh jesus lads I just posted something about a lad who loves what he does and there's always someone to give out about what he's doing. Nothing about how well he's done to grow up to 65ha 130 cows from never have been interested in cows or farming and couldn't get any money from banks
Deepsouthwest wrote: » I gave that man a spin up and down on wednesday, and yeah He's certainly a farming enthusiast, can't understand all the concrete I've poured over the last few yrs though, u can imagine the banter!
browned wrote: » Given the man in question is related to me I think one think has to be cleared up on his system. The 20ha is owned and the rest leased from various sources with a variety of terms. If he spend his money on builting sheds etc and the lease came up for sale would he be in a position to buy. What If he lost the lease and had reduce land base. Without putting in concrete he isn't tied to his 20ha owned block. God forbid he lost all his leased would any of ye want to pay for facilities for 130 cows on only 50 acres and no options. He can built up his herd now pocket money and move on to a larger block if the opportunity arises.
Milked out wrote: » Have heard of a situation as you describe, sheds built with new parlour on owned land with surrounding land rented only for a son to arrive home to farm that land leaving him with large sheds/loans and half his milking block gone
Greengrass1 wrote: » Do you know the lad that John Mccarthy pulled out from the side of the tent in Wednesday. from Cork don't know where abouts but is milking cows OAD did 415 kgs sold last yr on little or no meal. Has a off farm job too
jaymla627 wrote: » Got the t-shirt at that craic out in Australia, not a shed/feed pad to be seen with kale etc feed out along with silage in fields, then it dosent stop raining for 4 months bang in the middle of calving season. Final straw for me in one place was we had to start putting bales of hay out in calving paddock to provide a calving area so to speak and some feed, cue cows going to calve against said bales and ending in their backs when they rolled of them into the **** resulting in downer cow and dead calf.... Systems like that are self inflicted torture on man and beast when it goes wrong the thing is lads reckon they're saving a fortune/low cost if you add up the costs of mastitis/lameness/culling rates and damage done to ground it probably costs more then throwing up a shed the first day and be done with it, never liked grazing root crops/kale with cows either in wet conditions intake of clay is a serious problem and cows lose their shine look very raggy
just do it wrote: » Tell us more...
Greengrass1 wrote: » That's all I really know jdi. Milks in the morning before work and has a lad to do other work that needs to be done during the day I'm sure
frazzledhome wrote: » Firstly, hats off to that guy for he has the balls that most don't. If that's what the much decried "kiwi" way is I'm all for it.
Greengrass1 wrote: » If mam and dad were still in the old farm there would be no hope of me coming home to farm just too small. I would be doing the very same as this lad and **** the dept. Be aswell off without the payments for the amount if hoops they make us jump through
mahoney_j wrote: » Big statement gg fook the dept fook the co co fook the sfp !!.most of us here wouldn't survive without it .not a criticism but how would u think his neighbour would feel after investing slurry storage etc to be nitrates compliant and then see guy over the ditch with no storage virtually and cows out wintered etc .it amazes me talking to lads from different parts the different takes inspectors have on different things which can cause a farmer major headaches
Greengrass1 wrote: » Mj I rented land last yr with no entitlements attached now say I was going out on my own and took a bigger block with no entitlements. what could dept do to me if I was out wintering and had storage? How do the dept expect to get young farmers into farming if there not going to give them a chance to get there feet under thrm.
mahoney_j wrote: » Your creating double standards then,60% tams grant available for young farmersto give them a chance . .nitrates and regulations only going to get worse .why should farmers who had to invest in storage etc to become compliant have to look over the ditch at someone who isn't giving them the 2 fingers basically .
Greengrass1 wrote: » Having enough storage is only a paper exercise