Candie wrote: » He paid for a seat for himself. He didn't pay for one for his bag.
Candie wrote: » It's not hypocrisy when you expect others to do without a utility they paid for for your convenience though, right?
Candie wrote: » It's not tolerable, not if I want an hour or so of sleep. If you're constricted, then get a seat with extra leg room, instead of expecting other people to do without. It's inconsiderate to expect others not to fully utilise the seats they paid for for your convenience.
Knex. wrote: » You, on the other hand, are quite happy to make me, or anyone else, endure a pretty uncomfortable journey because you feel like its your right, just because the option is available.
Future Primitive wrote: » His bag is allowed on the bus without paying a fee for it. You're not paying for a seat per sé, you're paying to be transported from one point to another. Seats are there for convenience and comfort. I've no problem if someone wants to sit comfortably on a bus with heir bag beside them provided there are plenty of other seats around them and they're more than willing to move when other people get on. To say that's the height of ignorance is pretty silly.
Egginacup wrote: » Then you should complain to the airline that the seats recline and that you want planes fitted with seats that don't go back. If I want to get an couple hours sleep on a long flight, I'm putting the seat back. If you're behind me and you too put your seat back and go to sleep then what's the problem? I have a problem with arseholes chattering to each other loudly on an overnight flight when everyone else is trying to sleep or opening their window blind when it's dawning and flooding the bloody cabin with glaring light.
Bits_n_Bobs wrote: » Just listening to Sean Moncrief and they're talking about the retards who hog two seats on DARTS / buses etc. Drives me nuts to see some wanker sat sprawled across two seats, or using a bag to take up the seat beside them. Always make it my business to sit my oversized arse beside them in a slightly passive aggressive manner.
Candie wrote: » No, I don't feel like it's my right to make you uncomfortable. It is my right to use the seat I paid for though, and it's not your right to expect me not to because you're tall. If you need extra room, book the right seat rather than expect strangers to cater for you by doing without themselves.
Agricola wrote: » I dont need a seat with extra leg room. The regular seat is fine. I should pay more for a seat near the emergency doors just so I wont mind as much if the person in front decides to lie back on my chest for a kip? No. Sleep before the flight or after it. Or fly first class with cabins! Don't make someone else miserable for an hour or 2 just because you couldn't give a shít about anyone else. I'd recline my seat if there was a child behind me and I knew there would be so space issue for them. Not otherwise.
Agricola wrote: » You're basically saying " I paid some money for this seat and I intend to use it fully, mainly in order to completely maxmise my own comfort levels. If that happens to completely minimize the comfort of the person behind me, well tough ****" And that ladies and gentlemen, is why the world is one screwed up place.
Candie wrote: » It's not a case of not giving a sh!t. It's a case of you expecting the total stranger in front to go without a utility they paid for. Expecting strangers to not sleep on a flight for your convenience is entitled in the extreme. I can't get my head around people expecting other passengers to minimise their comfort so they can maximise theirs.
Candie wrote: » And you're basically saying that you don't care how much you inconvenience the person in front of you. as long as you're comfortable. So your comfort is more important than theirs? The world is screwed up alright.
fullstop wrote: » You can reline your seat enough to be comfortable enough to sleep without the person behind you having to look at the top of your head at close quarters and not be able to watch their monitor.
awec wrote: » I think you're the one saying that. You are the one arguing that severely inconveniencing and often discomforting the person behind you is ok cause you want to be a wee bit more comfortable and lie back as opposed to sitting up like the overwhelming majority of people are more than happy to do.
Candie wrote: » I can't get my head around people expecting other passengers to minimise their comfort so they can maximise theirs.
kneemos wrote: » Who wants some smelly pervert cnut sitting beside you. Have ye seen the sort that use the Lewis?...ugh.
Candie wrote: » Economy class seats do not recline that much, a few inches at most.
Knex. wrote: » I'm 6ft3 and have had people practically try and break my knees by putting their chairs back. 4 inches is a lot when your dealing in what is already confined space. Shouldn't even be an option.
fullstop wrote: » Maybe he's thinking he doesn't want to be a cnut to the person behind by having to be lying back on top of them...
Candie wrote: » No, I'm saying the seats are designed to be used and if someone pitches up on a cheap flight and expects other passengers to go without for their convenience, that they'd be better off booking the right seat instead of putting people out. That said, if someone politely asked me not to then I wouldn't. I just don't get the sense of entitlement that someone else has to do without, because you want extra room.
fullstop wrote: » You obviously haven't done much long haul flying if you believe that.
Candie wrote: » Height of ignorance.