NIMAN wrote: » When you have kids you have to accept that your life is going to change completely. Your freedom is gone until they get to the age when they can look after themselves, your social life is non-existent, you don't ever sleep right again, the list goes on. But if you can't accept these terms, then it's best not to start a family. I work with a couple of people who have had 1 child each and said there's definitely no more coming as 'they still want to have their nights on the beer, play golf, go on weekends away'. To me, this is an incredibly selfish attitude to have. I have 3 young kids and I can live without nights on the sauce or holidays as long as they are happy. Their wellbeing is more important than my social life.
NIMAN wrote: » But if you can't accept these terms, then it's best not to start a family. I work with a couple of people who have had 1 child each and said there's definitely no more coming as 'they still want to have their nights on the beer, play golf, go on weekends away'. To me, this is an incredibly selfish attitude to have. I have 3 young kids and I can live without nights on the sauce or holidays as long as they are happy. Their wellbeing is more important than my social life.
The Corinthian wrote: » So it's selfish only to decide to have only one child? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk
NIMAN wrote: » You are one sick parent to say honestly you wish you'd never had kids.
Realist2 wrote: » Anyone regret having kids?
73Cat wrote: » I don't know what it's like to have the freedom of being child free, as I had my first child young. No one to blame but ourselves . I was still living at home at the time, and moved out when she was 18 months. I don't regret my kids, but sometimes I wish I had left it longer. When I was my eldest girls age now, she was two. I love seeing her doing things for herself, having nights out with friends, and going off on holidays. I don't have a clue what it's like to do that kind of stuff! I suppose you can't miss what you never had, but I definitely wonder what it would be like. Given the choice though, it's no contest, I'd still have the life I have.
mariaalice wrote: » Well I preferred having the freedom and money in my forties and fifties than in my twenties but each to their own, I know some one in their fifties who is dealing with a 16year old teen horror and they don't have the psychical and mental energy to deal with it, not all teenagers are a horror one of mine never gave a moment bother as a teen and one was a nightmare so you never know.
Chemical Byrne wrote: » people with 4 or 5 children must be off their rockers. Having that many would age a person by 20 years I'd imagine! I cannot fathom why people would choose to have that many. Do they not value their own selves?
Chemical Byrne wrote: » Having children is something that causes me a lot of worry. I'm almost 29 and I definitely do want to have children and my current gf and I have discussed it and it's something we both want. My big worry tho is the loss of freedom and spontaneity that will result meaning I probably won't be able to travel or do adventurous things. And these are things I want to do and should have done in my 20's. My 20s are now drawing to a close and tbh, I feel that I squandered them in a dead end relationship and didn't do any proper travel or anything that could be described as interesting and fun whereas my gf has seen the world with her pals. I wasted myself in my 20s and I am racked with regret over it. I want to have house and children sorted before I'm 35 but conflicting with that I want to squeeze all the things I should have done in my 20s into the next few years also. I feel I will be under massive mental and financial pressure to get all of this done. My gf tells me not to worry myself over it and that because I am embarking on those things now, I will appreciate the value of it much more. Back to children, I do want them but I feel I'd be compromising on other things I want by doing so. I feel like I'm in a no-win situation of sorts. My only third option would be to make enough money to afford a good reliable nanny to take care of things if we were to go on a decent holiday. Fat chance of that! I would be happy with 1 child but I recognise that it is nice for them to have a sibling so I could deal with 2. I draw the line there - people with 4 or 5 children must be off their rockers. Having that many would age a person by 20 years I'd imagine! I cannot fathom why people would choose to have that many. Do they not value their own selves?