Phoebas wrote: » They'll all be promoted to vomit and piss cleaners! :eek: When driverless taxis come in there will be no need for individual owners of the cars, so it probably will all be owned and operated by the likes of Google and Apple, with the work of cleaning and maintenance being outsourced.
kneemos wrote: » Yeah right. What becomes of the driverless taxi when your friendly punter decides to wreck it after a couple of Sherry's?
goldencrisp62 wrote: » Rip off Republic back in full swing lads. A 15 minute taxi this morning cost me 30 euro. From red cow Luas to bewley's leopards town. Pretty disgusted I must say. I travelled on a 2 hour bus that cost me a tenner this morning to the red cow before having my pockets emptied by the thieves with the taxi plates.
goldencrisp62 wrote: » rip off republic - is it back? ?
Kevin Irving wrote: » Taxi's in this country are expensive alright. It won't last long though, autonomous cars will decimate the taxi industry in the next 5 years. Every major car company, along with Google and Apple are even working on this technology, so it's only a matter of time.
goldencrisp62 wrote: » rip off republic - is it back?
the_monkey wrote: » Will take a lot lot longer then 5 years, try 50 ...
Kevin Irving wrote: » You can buy a car today(Mercedesc, BMW, Lexis, etc) in Ireland that will follow the car in front via radar, automatically stay in lane, park itself, read road signs, obey speed limits, automatically accelerate and brake in traffic, and a whole lot more. Tesla are due to release a software update in October which will give full autonomous driving. Far closer than most people think.
dubscottie wrote: » We have aircraft that can fly themselves but you would still want a pilot up front right? Most of the above in cars is "assist".. Ie it only helps the driver. Does not do 100% of the job for the driver.
goldencrisp62 wrote: » Rip off Republic back in full swing lads. A 15 minute taxi this morning cost me 30 euro. From red cow Luas to bewley's leopards town.
Ronan|Raven wrote: » go on the m50?
Buona Fortuna wrote: » I'm sceptical. Relatives of mine were in Dingle when the dustbin lorry had a brake failure. Thankfully no one was hurt then - but in the event of some unforeseen malfunction who do we programme the computer to colide with? ~ the party of schoolkids ~ the young mother pushing a pram ~ the ambulance coming the other way ~ the OAP just minding their own business
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
anncoates wrote: » Wonder how they'll deal with no pays. Running them over or locking their doors and setting themselves on fire would be cool. Seriously though your belief that automated taxis will be cheaper is touching and probably almost certainly wrong, it being Ireland.
ScumLord wrote: » Of course they'd be cheaper, they wouldn't be bothering with the systems if they didn't believe they'd be cheaper. The biggest cost to just about any company is labour. Robots remove all the costs associated with hiring humans like maximum hours, safety regulations, insurance, strikes, holiday pay, maternity pay, training.. The list of costs associated with people goes on and on. Robots have their own costs which might seem high because it's expensive initially, but the day to day costs of running a robot are tiny compared to hiring a human. Even if you have to pay a fancy engineer a thousand Euros to spend a day fixing it, that's still not much more than a weeks wages for a human and it's a cost that usually only comes up every other year if people don't keep up with maintenance.
AMKC wrote: » A thousand euros for a weeks wages wish I could get that. Don,t know what planet you are living on but if that is the wages for a week it must be a good one. Can,t say I know many people getting that kind of money.