macjohn wrote: I find insert stove gets through timber very fast if only using timber so a "ton" wouldn't last that long.
Latro wrote: » How long would it take for you to go through this amount of wood?
Rossdburke wrote: » Only buy hardwood , the last few loads was birch. Generally cut down the year previous. Not kiln dried. Once the fire gets going , we close down the vents. Not sure of the exact weight of the logs, trailer load would be about 2.5 to 3 ton skip / builder bags or there abouts
Latro wrote: » Can you tell us how much those €2.50 logs weigh and more or less how dry they are? Hardwood or softwood?
Rossdburke wrote: » I don't use oil at all. We've an 18kw boiler stove which we burn logs 90% of the time. Very rarely would we use coal. The point I was trying to make is that €2.50 A day or €17.50 a week for logs to have a fire burning approximately 20hrs a day in winter , is cheap IMO....
Latro wrote: » 4liters x 20 hours x 10kWh(heat energy content per liter) x 0.8(efficiency)= 640kWh of heat energy Do you realize that it would be unbearable to live in that house with that amount of heat pumped in during 20h period? That amount of energy would be enough for 1 week at least. Also the heat would impossible to distribute around the house without back boiler. IMO logs are only viable if you get them for free or very close to it.
Rossdburke wrote: » I know this is an old post, but.... That works out about €2.50 A day. The same as I use in a multi fuel stove, which is burning approximately 20 hours a day in the winter. €.75 per litre X 4 litres per hour X 20 hours You're talking €60 oil per day.... Even half the hours of oil is €30 per day.... Personally, I find hardwood logs the way to go...
Rossdburke wrote: » I know this is an old post, but.... That works out about €2.50 A day. The same as I use in a multi fuel stove, which is burning approximately 20 hours a day in the winter. €.75 per litreX 4 litres per hour X 20 hours You're talking €60 oil per day....Even half the hours of oil is €30 per day.... Personally, I find hardwood logs the way to go...
lakesider wrote: » ill give you my take on it..I have a stanley erin multi fuel stove and was palnning on running her on coal and wood blocks, im in Donegal btw..I bought a tractor trailer of logs for 150 euro and was planning on starting the stove with coal then running her on wood for the rest of the eveining, I used up the logs in 60 days and figure that they were so overpriced I was better putting the 150 into coal, never mind the carrying and the stacking etc...logs are so way overpriced its a racket..
kah22 wrote: » Price? Worth buying in bulk? When I buy the stove will probably be 5kw
Jack180570 wrote: » Dathi, the energy content of firewood depends on it's moisture content. At the same moisture content, softwood has a higher energy content than hardwood. You are however correct in saying that in general, 1kg of coal = 2kg of dry firewood.
kah22 wrote: » Doing some Googling tonight I came across a product called 'Hotties,' a product made from compressed wood chips, sawdust, and it would seem suitable for a glass fronted wood burner. There also appear to be other such logs but 'Hotties' seem the most popular. From what I've managed to read it would seem that while the upfront price is more expensive because of their consistency they may prove more economical if buying a yearly supply Then I thought Bord na Móna and wondered if they did any products like a manufactured log suitable for wood burning stoves. Now I must admit I was thinking turf when I discovered they do a product called Eco Logs which seems to be the same sort of thing as Hotties - sawdust, compressed wood of some kind. Anyone on the Forum know anything about them - effectiveness, how long they burn, heat put out, that sort of thing. Price, well I suppose that will be different in various part of the country, I live in the north. Would love to hear the views of anyone who has tried them
Calahonda52 wrote: » if this is about the math for the most efficient bang for your energy spend then you would chose the most efficient burning mechanism, so maybe oil or gas or LPG etc at maybe 90% efficiency If you move down the efficiency ladder to mutifuel, then you are maybe at 67% max, with perfect fuel. Then you look at the kWh per euro and as pointed out above wood is half the energy value and thats assuming kiln dried. Based on that yes wood here is over priced because its more a yummy mummy/daddy/tree hugger/doing good fro environment idea rather than cold calculated math. Its over priced, full stop. In europe what I pay 350 euro for is 60 euro stacked in your garage. The one benefit it has is that timber is more amenable to being burned in smaller amounts on warmer days because if you dont burn the coal properly, with enough air then the kWh go up in smoke
dathi wrote: » hardwood has 4.1 kwh per kilo soft wood has 3.5 kwh per kg coal has 8.8 kwh per kg smokeless ovoids 8.8 kwh per kg so coal gives out twice the heat per kg as hardwood
kah22 wrote: » That's two saying 'overpriced' but let me push you a bit Lakesider. You bought a tractor load of logs 150 Euro and that lasted about 8 weeks? So we're talking about 18 euro a week? I appreciate that's not counting your time So how much would coal on its own have cost you over the same period? What sort of wood were you burning: hardwood, softwood, seasoned or green? At the moment I have a multi burner in one room. I bought a big of seasoned hardwood to test what it burns like. Maybe my logs were to big but I didn't get a decent flame last night. I'll go back to the hardwood tomorrow and make them smaller. I've been reading they should be about 30 cm long about 10 cm in diameter. We'll see what that produces I've just lit my fire now and am burning timber dry softwood I had around the house. There's a good flame and its throwing out plenty of heat
my3cents wrote: » One reason I used the term Deco stove was if you don't run it for maximum burn its very likely the glass will need a lot of cleaning to keep it looking good. Shut down for a long burn and the glass soots up even with a "clean burn" feature. Add to that if you haven't burnt solid fuel before you won't realise how much dust that can add to the house. Hence sometimes the stoves don't get as much use as originally intended.
Calahonda52 wrote: » Have you ever wondered why pallets don't rot? It is because they are treated with some of the most toxic preservative known to man. They were never designed to be in the consumer chain. The sawdust is also toxic. It is illegal to burn them as the flue gases are carcinogenic. You need a licence for the EPA to burn them.
kah22 wrote: » except on the Twelth Night.
my3cents wrote: » ....OP Only checked the Morso but it only takes 33cm logs thats 13-14 inches max. Traditionally logs are cut at 12 inch and 16 inch lengths and I wouldn't get a stove that didn't take 16 inch logs (18 inch fire box). It just takes more effort to cut and stack 12 inch logs so they can be more expensive.
my3cents wrote: » OP the stoves you have listed are WOOD burning ONLY. More of a decor item than anything else. If you have a stove like that then you really do need to burn good quality logs and definitely not coal. ... Only checked the Morso but it only takes 33cm logs thats 13-14 inches max. Traditionally logs are cut at 12 inch and 16 inch lengths and I wouldn't get a stove that didn't take 16 inch logs (18 inch fire box). It just takes more effort to cut and stack 12 inch logs so they can be more expensive.
Calahonda52 wrote: » Have you ever wondered why pallets don't rot? .........It is illegal to burn them ....
SCOL wrote: » I'm the same I stack up in the summer, I get it free cut 2 or 3 wheel barrows at the weekend during the summer and I'm all set for the winter. I also have a stack of pallets at work so I can work on them also. My only cost is petrol and a 2nd hand chain saw. I don't care if it hard or soft wood I get it for free and I get lots of it. I can't pass a skip without looking into it and asking is it ok to pull out a few lenghts it all helps last year I got 1/2 skip of oak flooring asked could I take it cut it all up it lasted about 4 months.
SCOL wrote: » I also have a stack of pallets at work so I can work on them also.