nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Applied Maths aftermath

Kremin

didnt see one and wasnt sure if the general should be used...
Wtf was that projectile question?
I think that was the hardest app. Maths exam in a while? All the questions seemed really long

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

OMGeary

Somehow I missed the shortest distance q in question 2, no ****ing idea how I missed it

PotmBottom

I couldn't do 3(a) at all, very tough question I thought, does it matter if your angle is incorrect for the following parts of the question? Our teacher never told us how it's marked really. I thought 1,10 and 5 were lovley, 4 was good as well. For someone who was a d3 student at my pre I'm delighted how far I've come.

Kremin

PotmBottom wrote: »

I couldn't do 3(a) at all, very tough question I thought, does it matter if your angle is incorrect for the following parts of the question? Our teacher never told us how it's marked really. I thought 1,10 and 5 were lovley, 4 was good as well. For someone who was a d3 student at my pre I'm delighted how far I've come.

I only got q3 when i realised Sy was -3 not 0.. Had to use a lot of identities to get there.. Could not do part b, attempted it many ways but couldnt get it. I felt like every part iii of a question was a trick and it really worried me.. Like the speed of the particle when it starts moving?

AlfaJack

I wrote Sy was -3 but still got weird answers but hopefully i'll get the marks for the method :P

Kremin

AlfaJack wrote: »

I wrote Sy was -3 but still got weird answers but hopefully i'll get the marks for the method :P

same.. i had like Cos^2A, converted it to Cos2A and then to Tan^2a+1 or something, i got a negative angle so I dont eve know.

expiiplus1

The way do do 3 a) was to make Sy(0) =3.
I thought it was a lovely test. Definitely much easier that year. I didn't do it, but 4b looked the hardest on the test.

dalta5billion

I avoided the projectiles, other than that seemed alright.

For the particles with the loose string, did P begin to move at the same speed as Q was a split second earlier?

PotmBottom

AlfaJack wrote: »

I wrote Sy was -3 but still got weird answers but hopefully i'll get the marks for the method :P

I did as well, like tan = 24 or 27 or something and -.17, very odd, tried it 4 or 5 times and couldn't get a different answer, perhaps there is something wrong with the q? Did they leave some information out? I used the fact that 1/cos^x = 1+tan^x and I couldn't get it.

Kremin

dalta5billion wrote: »

I avoided the projectiles, other than that seemed alright.

For the particles with the loose string, did P begin to move at the same speed as Q was a split second earlier?

I'm not sure, I calculated the new acceleration but it was still an acceleration not deceleration...... so the speed wouldnt have changed?

Kremin

PotmBottom wrote: »

I did as well, like tan = 24 or 27 or something and -.17, very odd, tried it 4 or 5 times and couldn't get a different answer, perhaps there is something wrong with the q? Did they leave some information out? I used the fact that 1/cos^x = 1+tan^x and I couldn't get it.

That's what I got too, 17 or 27 and -.175 if i remember correctly, the numbers are vague but I was definitely in and around there.

rooney1369

Were angles for 3(a) tan^-1 4/3 and tan^-1 3/4 as the only 2 possible triangles that can be made with hypotenuse of 50 are with sides 40 and 30 and 30 and 40?

rooney1369

rooney1369 wrote: »

Were angles for 3(a) tan^-1 4/3 and tan^-1 3/4 as the only 2 possible triangles that can be made with hypotenuse of 50 are with sides 40 and 30 and 30 and 40?

Ah **** ignore my stupidity

Doctorhopeful

Over the moon with that paper, besides a few little bits I think i managed everything

did Qs 2,3,4,5, 8, 10, and i was able to get the answer everytime they said "show blah = blah"
Went in hoping for a B3, i'd be disappoited now if i don't manage an A :P thought it was much easier than last year, but the projectiles Q required a lot of thinking and visualising. IM SO GLAD IM FREE

Sy = -3 NOOOOO IM SUCH A FOOL, never gonna forgive myself for putting it equal to 0!!! xD

PotmBottom

Kremin wrote: »

That's what I got too, 17 or 27 and -.175 if i remember correctly, the numbers are vague but I was definitely in and around there.

88 degrees ring more of a bell?

Kremin

Doctorhopeful wrote: »

Over the moon with that paper, besides a few little bits I think i managed everything did Qs 2,3,4,5, 8, 10, and i was able to get the answer everytime they said "show blah = blah"
Went in hoping for a B3, i'd be disappoited now if i don't manage an A :P thought it was much easier than last year, but the projectiles Q required a lot of thinking and visualising. IM SO GLAD IM FREE

I did Q1,Q3,Q4,Q5,Q8,Q10
Q10 was really handy, as was Q8 I thought.... do you remember what you got for x? I think i got 1/root12? I wasn't sure what the best method to differentiate T was and I remembered my teacher saying you can ignore the 2pi and square root as its periodic or something... hopefully I wasn't mistaken D=

PotmBottom wrote: »

88 degrees ring more of a bell?

I didn't convert to degrees at all, it said values of TanB so I just left it as that?

expiiplus1

I think so tan-1(28) should be your man

Doctorhopeful

Kremin wrote: »

I did Q1,Q3,Q4,Q5,Q8,Q10
Q10 was really handy, as was Q8 I thought.... do you remember what you got for x? I think i got 1/root12? I wasn't sure what the best method to differentiate T was and I remembered my teacher saying you can ignore the 2pi and square root as its periodic or something... hopefully I wasn't mistaken D=

I ended up with 2root3 i think, but not entirely sure if that was right! Bollix, didn't realise now that 2root3 is bigger than 0.5 oops :P

Kremin

Doctorhopeful wrote: »

I ended up with 2root3 i think, but not entirely sure if that was right!

ah well, probably get a good few attempt marks whichever one of us is wrong anyway.

Doctorhopeful

Realising a couple of stupid mistakes I made, maybe i shouldn't be so quick to think I did better than a B3 after all :P i'm just so glad I was able to give a decent attempt at 6 of them, that's the real success story!

expiiplus1

I maintain that it was the easiest exam in years.
Q1a was trivial and b wasn't much harder.
Q2 was a complete reversion to predictable format
Q3a was weirdly phrased, but the maths involved was predictable. Q3b was trivial
Q4 I didn't do, but a) looked easy. b) looked harder.
Q5 was the simplest such problem I've ever seen.
Q6,Q7,Q8 I didn't look at, so I can't comment.
Q9a has appeared on papers before. Q9b was strangely phrased again, but easy.
Q10 was easier than the problems that appeared on Maths Paper 1 this year.

YouKnowNothing

Somehow managed to mess up 2b, other than that it should be OK

PotmBottom

expiiplus1 wrote: »

I maintain that it was the easiest exam in years.
Q1a was trivial and b wasn't much harder.
Q2 was a complete reversion to predictable format
Q3a was weirdly phrased, but the maths involved was predictable. Q3b was trivial
Q4 I didn't do, but a) looked easy. b) looked harder.
Q5 was the simplest such problem I've ever seen.
Q6,Q7,Q8 I didn't look at, so I can't comment.
Q9a has appeared on papers before. Q9b was strangely phrased again, but easy.
Q10 was easier than the problems that appeared on Maths Paper 1 this year.

I couldn't believe that Q10 I saw, I was so screwed if a standard part (a) came up, I always found those tough. It was so standard mathsy it was great.

Btw, is the distance the section between the two curves on the graph?

2345

for Q10bii
anyone get around 3000

PotmBottom wrote: »

I couldn't believe that Q10 I saw, I was so screwed if a standard part (a) came up, I always found those tough. It was so standard mathsy it was great.

Btw, is the distance the section between the two curves on the graph?

yep got the same thing

PotmBottom

2345 wrote: »

yep got the same thing

2845 I think I got for it, I thought it was just the C value of the equation that you ignore because you are using limits in Part Two?

2345

PotmBottom wrote: »

2845 I think I got for it, I thought it was just the C value of the equation that you ignore because you are using limits in Part Two?

i done C(160)-C(120)
but i dont know if that is right

expiiplus1

Yep. I do economics, so I was delighted with 10b. Anybody else think that they seem to be making applied maths more applied? More project mathsy?

PotmBottom

expiiplus1 wrote: »

Yep. I do economics, so I was delighted with 10b. Anybody else think that they seem to be making applied maths more applied? More project mathsy?

I think it's because of the removal of Integration by substitution they are kind of stuck for questions now. I am no expert.

MmmPancakes

Kremin wrote: »

same.. i had like Cos^2A, converted it to Cos2A and then to Tan^2a+1 or something, i got a negative angle so I dont eve know.

I used u^2sin2a/g = 18.5, then found Sin2A = 0.07325 or something, then just solved it like you would in maths and got like 2 degrees and 88 degrees. I think it's wrong, but I derived the formula and then got 1 angle correct at least.. hopefully they don't crucify me lol

Q2 (a), what did ye get for the shortest distance? Also in 2(b) did anyone get the direction of the rain as 19 degrees?

expiiplus1

New article : www.independent.ie/irish-news/education/exams/leaving-certificate-applied-maths-nearer-the-right-balance-this-year-31314804.html

my shortest distance was 0.64km or something like that

MmmPancakes

expiiplus1 wrote: »

my shortest distance was 0.64km or something like that

oh my

lads I think I might have scraped the B then, I was only looking to pass :')