penev10 wrote: » New NIER and Fire Emblem 2 nice surprises at E3 for me FFVII remake can do one
NoviGlitzko wrote: » Anyone have any idea when FF7 will be expecting to make a release? I'm so hyped for it, but at the same time worried because it's Enix.
Retr0gamer wrote: » Also you can't just look exclusively at FF and KH games since Square produce a lot more than that. In my eyes the only misstep was FF13.
It's basically Square had one bad game... it must be enix's fault because that happened years ago!
As for FFXIII, it has a good argument for best soundtrack of the series and that battle system is excellent. Pity the corridor design couldn't support it and it got boring since there was nothing else to do.
Sephiroth_dude wrote: » Ordered steins gate and SAO game from vgp and chose dhl for delivery , was hoping to have them this evening but there stuck in customs it seems :rolleyes:
Xenji wrote: » How long since it dispatched, it has not been an issue so far for me, they just say the usual that its novelty toys.
Sephiroth_dude wrote: » Wednesday, it got delayed because they were waiting for steins gate to come in.
Lahinchians wrote: » Just picked up a vita. What should I look out for?
Retr0gamer wrote: » I loved the battle system for FF13 especially in boss battles when it got very tactical. It just took 20+ hours before you had all the systems in place for it to be fun... :rolleyes:
NoviGlitzko wrote: » Thanks for the info. I like Uematsu's work on title's like FFVIII & FFX much better than FFXIII. Why couldn't it be fun from the beginning though? I gave up after chapter 8 iirc. I couldn't bring myself to play anymore.
Retr0gamer wrote: » I do know a lot of people say it's Enix that ruined Square but they are hardly ruined considering they're still mostly consistent in putting out high quality titles and the big fact that Enix has no real input into game design, merely handling publishing duties. Honestly the people that say that just see Square as a company that puts out FF games and ignored the 13 sequels and have no idea what the square/enix merge meant to their structure. It's basically Square had one bad game... it must be enix's fault because that happened years ago!
Retr0gamer wrote: » Basically the game part was where the least amount of work went I think they were desperately trying to copy western trends at the time as well except they copied all the bad things. Endless incessant tutorials designed to baby the player so they wouldn't lose interest if they didn't understand and those codices like Bioware has in their games that was dreadful ways of delivering story to the player. To sum it up it was a mess of a production. Probably needed a year of two in the oven since the elements were there to make a fun game even if the story was bad, lets face it story was never a FF strong point). They just needed to get it out there after the protracted development.
Xenji wrote: » Persona 4 Freedom Wars Demon Gaze Disgaea 4 Oreshika: Tainted Bloodlines Tokyo Twilight Ghost Hunters Operation Abyss: New Tokyo Toukiden Akiba's Trip Atelier Rorona Plus: The Alchemist of Arland Ys Memories of Celceta Tale Of Heart R Visual Novels : Steins;Gate Danganronpa 1&2 Virtue's Last Reward