Grayson wrote: » There's no actual evidence to support him though. It's all just a story. And you expect us to believe a very unbelievable story with out evidence?
Seo.OBriain wrote: » I didn't suggest anyone should believe anything without some proof and I'm not 100% convinced myself either. My point was that rather than sitting on the fence a lot of people are just taking the easy road, just dismissing it and labeling him a loon.
Seo.OBriain wrote: » I didn't suggest anyone should believe anything without some proof and I'm not 100% convinced myself either. My point was that rather than sitting on the fence a lot of people are just taking the easy road, just dismissing it and labeling him a loon. At the same time, there's no definitive evidence to prove what he says is untrue or that he is a loon and there won't be unless there's an investigation. Assuming he is telling the truth, taking on the state is going to be a total nightmare for him. Anyway, I would normally just ignore the banter that annoys me as it's a public forum and people can say what they think etc. No big deal.
Seo.OBriain wrote: » At the same time, there's no definitive evidence to prove what he says is untrue
extra gravy wrote: » The note underneath the video is hilarious: "Less than 72 hours after posting this video, Joe reported that "up to 20 Gardai and a number of detectives in riot gear" stormed his house while Joe and his family were still in bed. ...........
www. integrityireland .ie , www .checkpoint .ie ... etc [FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]About the Author[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Stephen Manning is a widely traveled professional educator with experience in several fields including the military; adventure sports; international tourism;[/FONT] Archery and Small Arms SkillsArmy Assistant Physical Training InstructorNATO Forces
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]About the Author[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Stephen Manning is a widely traveled professional educator with experience in several fields including the military; adventure sports; international tourism;[/FONT] Archery and Small Arms SkillsArmy Assistant Physical Training InstructorNATO Forces
mynamejeff wrote: » knee deep in nut bag crazy but sure its anti garda so its properly true
mynamejeff wrote: » hardly the same thing now is it.
irish_major wrote: » I watched the whole thing. 50 minutes of my life I'll never get back.
Enjoy Heroin Responsibly wrote: » Where his story starts to fall apart is when cops are being brought in from Harcourt Street I mean redneck cops tend to be lazy by nature and are not going to be arsed arranging such a ludicrously elaborate conspiracy. Involving judges, lawyers and coppers from other parts of the country. The more elaborate the conspiracy the more likelihood of an honest cop becoming involved, smelling a rat and blowing the whistle.
makeorbrake wrote: » That aspect of his claims is corroborated.
mynamejeff wrote: » hardly a x files style conspiracy
mynamejeff wrote: » Did nt read that they appeared in court , Just that "he says that they say" ....... as for stopping his after the court might well be that they knew he was committing a road traffic offence or existing warrants or any number of reasons but because this man preferred to risk the lives of gardai than pull over and asked to do.
mynamejeff wrote: the initial claim is that the gardai raided his house without a warrant. now its a incorrect warrant.
mynamejeff wrote: If his partner has a similar attitude to him i wouldn't fancy having her work for me either.
mynamejeff wrote: as it stands he harassed one woman sent threats to judges and gardai disrupted courts damaged a innocent bystanders car and injured a garda ........
makeorbrake wrote: » Really? :-) So you think that a Garda would pull him over when a number of court proceedings are in train (one of them only hours beforehand) - pointedly alleging garda malpractice/malfeasance? And you allege who is delusional.....?? Ok, so she is guilty by association then? So - if you are employing someone and the guards come and whisper something in your ear, then you would immediately serve notice on your employee?Allegedly. And if that's innocence expressing itself, then you're a model citizen of a state where there's no accountability for state bodies nor is there any transparency. Sometimes it seems to me that citizens are deserving of the governance that they have at some stage endorsed.
wildlifeboy wrote: » You might want to watch it first
mynamejeff wrote: » Why wouldn't they engage with him ? are you saying they shouldn't do their jobs
mynamejeff wrote: » because he spouts nonsense every time he is brought before the courts ?
mynamejeff wrote: » in reality id say he is treated with as much good humor as possible
mynamejeff wrote: you have no idea how why or even if she was fired .
mynamejeff wrote: just the ranting of some one who cant even keep his own delusions straight ie the warrant that he alleged didnt exist
mynamejeff wrote: convicted of one count after a district and circuit court trial and judicial review hearing of harassment.
mynamejeff wrote: he seems to have already admitted to hit and run
Little CuChulainn wrote: His claims about forged signatures are based on some incorrect assumption he has about the kind of paper that was used. He has not produced one iota of proof or motive for a national conspiracy against him.
obezyana wrote: If all of this is true and it all started over a woman she must of been some looker. Any chance of a picture of her so we can all be the judge of whether he deserved the harassment or not?????
makeorbrake wrote: » My understanding is that he had an independent expert lined up to give evidence with regard to that matter - but the courts would not afford him the opportunity of producing that witness!
Little CuChulainn wrote: » His expert said it was his signature. His smoking gun was about indentations in the paper. Mr Doocey claimed that statements are taken on individual sheets and filed so indentations proved that all the statements had come from the same copy pad and this was evidence of them being doctored. In reality, all this means is that the Garda taking statements put the completed sheets underneath the fresh ones as he was taking the statement.
makeorbrake wrote: » All I know is that he had an expert witness ready to take the stand but wasn;t given the opportunity. In the meantime, it transpires that Mr. Doocey's partner was stopped by Gardai in Wicklow today - for 'driving erratically'. Are they both such a danger to society behind the wheel now? How much coincidence do we need here? Wake up and smell the coffee!