nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Claire Byrne Live (RTE1)

bazermc

RTE.ie on front page says 9:35pm

EPG says 10:35pm

I guess as long as Claire knows what time she is on at........:P

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

North of 32

Stop citing the US as a comparison. This is Ireland. The US has zero relevance in this debate.

Un Croissant

Who gives a **** about Catholic ethos in schools? Most people put up with it.

United Chester Men

now there is a bigotted viewpoint.

Lisha

I'm voting yes but I am fearful that people are saying they'll vote yes but I think they could vote no at the polls.

Mr.Nice Guy

'Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has always been' says the blonde lady. It gets a big round of applause.

I'm reminded of a quote by Thomas Paine: "A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right."

fergus1001

On a side note can I just say clair is looking on point tonight, those lips wow

Carry on

BlaasForRafa

FixdePitchmark wrote: »

It isn't a family. It is a partnership.

Huh? Explain.

Un Croissant

Pope Francis, expert on child welfare.

tampopo

Both me mother (yesterday) and a friend of 30 years (today) have told me they're voting no...disapointing...

Streetwalker

Jesus. And to think some say the nation has moved on? Hard to believe so many bigots could be crammed into one studio.

Atlantic Dawn

Are we getting any debates on the presidential age?

Un Croissant

Imagine how boring adjudicating the random selection was.

FunLover18

Jaysus, did the priest really need to wear his robes?

coolhull

Woodville56 wrote: »

Across all parties, a number of TD's privately oppose this referendum

So that's 166 votes spoken for. Should the rest of us have an opinion?

Mr.Nice Guy

Claire: 'The order of the closing statements was determined by a random draw adjudicated by an official blah, blah, blah.'

In order words, you tossed a coin.

Lisha

tampopo wrote: »

Both me mother (yesterday) and a friend of 30 years (today) have told me they're voting no...disapointing...

I really think it will be a close run thing. People need to get out and vote

FixdePitchmark

I'd say it will be Yes 65 % - No 35 %.

It is a flawed amendment in the wrong article - but , people will not vote against "love".

fergus1001

May I just say clairs lips are looking well tonight, wow

Carry on

Un Croissant

Fuuuucking hell, Ronan. Harvest

hotmail.com

The No side wants to focus on two men rearing children.

It seems to be anti-men if anything else.

Lisha

No side so obsessed with surrogacy and 2gay dads!!

Un Croissant

Oh ****, they had all the nos in a big group with a sign. Everyone in the country voting no was there tonight.

Missed those figures

FixdePitchmark

Streetwalker wrote: »

Jesus. And to think some say the nation has moved on? Hard to believe so many bigots could be crammed into one studio.

Yes the Bigot card :rolleyes:

We want to redefine everything in family Article 41 - if you don't agree you are intellectually weak and shouldn't have a vote.

Sums up the Yes side.

ItAintMeBabe

Jesus RTE really dropped the ball on ensuring the audience was unbiased. Ridiculous, I respect the views of all but as another poster said, it was a studio full of bigots.

5uspect

Utterly appalling behaviour by the No side of the audience. But it did look like all of them were there tonight.

BlaasForRafa

FixdePitchmark wrote: »

I'd say it will be Yes 65 % - No 35 %.

It is a flawed amendment in the wrong article - but , people will not vote against "love".

Perhaps you could get back to me about

Originally Posted by FixdePitchmark View Post
It isn't a family. It is a partnership.

Atlantic Dawn

Any other debates scheduled before polling day?

coolhull

Woodville56 wrote: »

Then why not allow FG TD's free speech on this issue - why the diktat from Kenny to follow the party line ??

You seem to have great confidence in what 166 TD'S might wish to speechify about. Good luck with that

United Chester Men

Imagine if you were struggling with your sexuality and tuned in to see one of your relations, brother, sister, aunt, uncle etc responding hysterically and whooping and hailing Ronan Mullens No speech at the end like he was advocating the liberation of slavery...................

eviltwin

FixdePitchmark wrote: »

Yes the Bigot card :rolleyes:

We want to redefine everything in family Article 41 - if you don't agree you are intellectually weak and shouldn't have a vote.

Sums up the Yes side.

Oh relax, gay marriage won't affect you at all. Like you care about kids, what a red herring.