somefeen wrote: » I heard on the radiotoday that she has since been active on an online account. Facebook, twitter or something Any more on this?
massdebater wrote: » I don't know the girl personally but it all seems like a normal student night out tbh. Girl, drunk, leaves nightclub with guy, forgetting her jacket. Goes back to his. Nothing out of the ordinary there. She leaves his at 4am. Again, not unusual to leave afterwards, especially if you have work/uni the next day. Cheap student rathers walking home than paying for taxi. Again, I've done that on nights out and ended up walking for over 90 mins. Nothing overly strange about that. Girl doesn't arrive home. This, for me, is the first unusual thing. The rest of the story, I've personally encountered a few times. Maybe I'm wrong but there doesn't appear to be anything suspicious about her behaviour during most of this story.
rawn wrote: » I can't speculate as to why she left with a man without telling her friends. But as others said, maybe she left his house at 4am cos she had a bad feeling, and cos she had no jacket she had no money for a taxi so walked? Probably no phone on her either.
michael999999 wrote: An awful lot of assumptions being made by people here FFS!
hotmail.com wrote: » Out of character then suggests she was interfered with. Some people focus on the victim's behaviour rather than the perpetrator which I find bizarre. Anyway, I hope there is a happy outcome.
Laois_Man wrote: » But she's not a guy and when it's out of character as we're told, then it's erratic behavior!
seventeen sheep wrote: » Ah now, sounds like an average college student on a night out. If a guy had done similar, few people would be judging him on erratic behaviour.
spockety wrote: » I wonder if it will turn out that he drives a silver car..
The Backwards Man wrote: » I'd imagine he probably is a suspect, but I've seen the Polis do it that way before. They don't identify people as suspects until they have something concrete to suspect them of.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Nobody has been arrested. The police traced the guy who Karen met at the nightclub, they spoke to him and he said they walked to Church Street (a shot distance away) and they got into his car to his flat in Dorchester Avenue. She spent a few hours there and left to walk back to the City Centre at 4am.
Strazdas wrote: » Yes, I was thinking that myself listening to the accounts today. She left the nightclub with a man she had only just met and without even telling her friends and apparently went back to his house for an intimate encounter. She then left his house at 4am and went wandering off into the night.....sounds like the poor girl was behaving very erratically.
Laois_Man wrote: » Exactly Nobody would feel safer walking 5K home at 4am than they would getting a taxi there! Then again, the fact that she voluntarily left the nightclub without telling anyone suggests something erratic was going on with her.
SpaceSasqwatch wrote: » sorry thought the first guy got cleared due to his alibi? or am i missing something? a 2nd arrest?
dixiefly wrote: » Or would there be cctv corroborating the story regarding her leaving at 4am?
SpaceSasqwatch wrote: » maybe he has an alibi?
beks101 wrote: » I don't understand how this guy is not being called a suspect. What rules him out as a suspect?