A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » The 4am account is from the chap with no corroboration so far
beks101 wrote: » I don't understand how this guy is not being called a suspect. What rules him out as a suspect?
Hachiko wrote: » Glasgow is a pitful dump, was there a few times. Hope she is found but it doesnt bode well the fact she has not contacted anyone.
SpaceSasqwatch wrote: » maybe he has an alibi?
dixiefly wrote: » Or would there be cctv corroborating the story regarding her leaving at 4am?
SpaceSasqwatch wrote: » sorry thought the first guy got cleared due to his alibi? or am i missing something? a 2nd arrest?
Laois_Man wrote: » Exactly Nobody would feel safer walking 5K home at 4am than they would getting a taxi there! Then again, the fact that she voluntarily left the nightclub without telling anyone suggests something erratic was going on with her.
Strazdas wrote: » Yes, I was thinking that myself listening to the accounts today. She left the nightclub with a man she had only just met and without even telling her friends and apparently went back to his house for an intimate encounter. She then left his house at 4am and went wandering off into the night.....sounds like the poor girl was behaving very erratically.
A Dub in Glasgo wrote: » Nobody has been arrested. The police traced the guy who Karen met at the nightclub, they spoke to him and he said they walked to Church Street (a shot distance away) and they got into his car to his flat in Dorchester Avenue. She spent a few hours there and left to walk back to the City Centre at 4am.
The Backwards Man wrote: » I'd imagine he probably is a suspect, but I've seen the Polis do it that way before. They don't identify people as suspects until they have something concrete to suspect them of.
spockety wrote: » I wonder if it will turn out that he drives a silver car..
seventeen sheep wrote: » Ah now, sounds like an average college student on a night out. If a guy had done similar, few people would be judging him on erratic behaviour.
Laois_Man wrote: » But she's not a guy and when it's out of character as we're told, then it's erratic behavior!
hotmail.com wrote: » Out of character then suggests she was interfered with. Some people focus on the victim's behaviour rather than the perpetrator which I find bizarre. Anyway, I hope there is a happy outcome.
michael999999 wrote: An awful lot of assumptions being made by people here FFS!
rawn wrote: » I can't speculate as to why she left with a man without telling her friends. But as others said, maybe she left his house at 4am cos she had a bad feeling, and cos she had no jacket she had no money for a taxi so walked? Probably no phone on her either.