smash wrote: » Teachers are big shots now?
Lollipop95 wrote: » people round my area seem to think so anyways !
Corvo wrote: » I like it, and believe me - I'm no big shot! The sport section is particularly good, with some great opinion pieces. And the Sunday Times makes for a days reading, across a lot of subjects. Anyone that criticises anyone who reads the Times as being a big shot are probably the same people who enjoy reading The Sun.
Lollipop95 wrote: » Only one person I know reads the IT and the person is a former university lecturer, not sure if there's a correlation.
mikom wrote: » Well my puppy made a big shot all over the Irish Times I laid down for him.
syklops wrote: » Was it a hot shot as well?
Johnnio13 wrote: » Great sports coverage.
mikom wrote: » It got Breda O'Brien right in her sanctimonious face...
Tarzana2 wrote: » Down the country, to a certain generation, yes. My father puts teachers in this category. And nurses. Actually, some teachers of his generation put themselves in this category. I remember waitressing at a catering thing at a teachers conference years ago. The older teacher were as whole a very uppity demographic. Bizarre, but there you go.
Turtwig wrote: » The Irish times is viewed as the paper best highlighting the decline in reputable fact checking journalism.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » I was with you until this! The only reason I have ever been tempted to buy the Indo is because of its excellent sports analysis. With the exceptions of Roddy L'Estrange and Gerry Thornley, the quality of the IT's sports coverage is ferociously weak and erratic.
HeidiHeidi wrote: » It's the only paper in the country that covers my sport of choice!
Lollipop95 wrote: » a lot of people I know complain about the price of it and claim the Indo is a lot cheaper